ArticlePLoS pathogens2021
Recognizing species as a new focus of virus research.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Giant RNA genomes: Roles of host, translation elongation, genome architecture, and proteome in nidoviruses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Shine: A novel strategy to extract specific, sensitive and well-conserved biomarkers from massive microbial genomic datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Determinants of Virus Variation, Evolution, and Host Adaptation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Towards Efficient and Accurate SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequence Typing Based on Supervised Learning Approaches.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- COVID-19: comprehensive review on mutations and current vaccines.Archives of microbiology · 2021Review
- The Bunyavirales: The Plant-Infecting Counterparts.Viruses · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species taxa are the units of taxonomy most suited to measure virus diversity, and they account for more than 70% of all virus taxa. Yet, as evidenced by the content of GenBank entries and illustrated by the recent literature on SARS-CoV-2, they are the most neglected taxa of virus research. To correct this disparity, we propose to make species taxa a first choice for communicating virus taxonomy in publications concerning viruses. We see it as a key step toward promoting research on diverse viruses, including pathogens, at this fundamental level of biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.