Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661996›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Abstinence-related motivational engagement for smoking cessation: Longitudinal patterns and predictive validity.

Amanda M Palmer, Steven K Sutton, John B Correa, Vani N Simmons, Thomas H Brandon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda M PalmerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5833-034X
Steven K SuttonDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
John B CorreaMental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6054-3056
Vani N SimmonsDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Thomas H BrandonDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Extended Self-Help for Smoking CessationR01CA134347 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Abstinence-Related Motivational Engagement (ARME) scale was developed to assess motivation to remain abstinent after a smoking cessation attempt. The ARME demonstrated reliability and validity among a small sample of ex-smokers. This study expands the psychometric evaluation of the ARME and tests the ARME as a predictor of smoking status among a sample of participants quitting smoking. The parent trial tested the efficacy of a self-help smoking cessation intervention (N = 1874), with assessments every 6 months. Internal consistency and factor structure of the ARME was evaluated at each assessment to confirm use of the measure as designed. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing the ARME to the Situation-specific Abstinence Self-Efficacy (SSE) scale via inter-correlations and prediction of future smoking status. Finally, the trajectories of both the ARME and SSE were compared among continuous abstainers and continuous smokers. A single-factor structure was observed at each assessment. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.88-0.91 for the total sample. Correlations between the ARME and the SSE ranged from 0.38-0.47 (ps <0.001) among smokers; and from 0.09-0.15 (most ps > 0.05) among abstainers. Among current smokers, the ARME and SSE were independent positive predictors of subsequent abstinence (AORs 1.28-2.29, ps <0.001). For those currently abstinent, only the SSE predicted subsequent abstinence (AORs 1.69-2.60, ps <0.05). GEE analyses showed different trajectories for the two measures, as well as between abstainers and smokers. In conclusion, the ARME is a reliable, valid measure with unique predictive utility for current smokers and a distinct trajectory among those who have successfully quit.

Indexed as

MotivationSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSelf EfficacySmokersSmoking

Identifiers

PMID33661996
PMCPMC7932153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.