Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661982›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Assessing service availability and readiness to manage Chronic Respiratory Diseases (CRDs) in Bangladesh.

Progga Paromita, Hasina Akhter Chowdhury, Cinderella Akbar Mayaboti, Shagoofa Rakhshanda, A K M Fazlur Rahman, Md Rizwanul Karim, Saidur Rahman Mashreky

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Progga ParomitaKirtipasha Union Health and Family Welfare Centre, Jhalokathi Sadar Upazila, Barishal, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-4395-3974
Hasina Akhter ChowdhuryCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Cinderella Akbar MayabotiCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shagoofa RakhshandaCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A K M Fazlur RahmanCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Rizwanul KarimDepartment of Non Communicable Disease Control, Directorate General of Health and Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Saidur Rahman MashrekyCentre for Injury Prevention and Research, Bangladesh (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-798X
Directorate General of Health Services · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic Respiratory Diseases (CRDs) are some of the most prevailing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide and cause three times higher morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) than in developed nations. In Bangladesh, there is a dearth of data about the quality of CRD management in health facilities. This study aims to describe CRD service availability and readiness at all tiers of health facilities using the World Health Organization's (WHO) Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2017 to June 2018 in a total of 262 health facilities in Bangladesh using the WHO SARA Standard Tool. Surveys were conducted with facility management personnel by trained data collectors using REDCap software. Descriptive statistics for the availability of CRD services were calculated. Composite scores for facility readiness (Readiness Index 'RI') were created which included four domains: staff and guideline, basic equipment, diagnostic capacity, and essential medicines. RI was calculated for each domain as the mean score of items expressed as a percentage. Indices were compared to a cutoff of70% which means that a facility index above 70% is considered 'ready' to manage CRDs at that level. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Vr 21.0.

resultsIt was found, tertiary hospitals were the only hospitals that surpassed the readiness index cutoff of 70%, indicating that they had adequate capacity and were ready to manage CRDs (RI 78.3%). The mean readiness scores for the other hospital tiers in descending order were District Hospitals (DH): 40.6%, Upazila Health Complexes (UHC): 33.3% and Private NGOs: 39.5%).

conclusionOnly tertiary care hospitals, constituting 3.1% of sampled health facilities, were found ready to manage CRD. Inadequate and unequal supplies of medicine as well as a lack of trained staff, guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of CRDs, equipment, and diagnostic facilities contributed to low readiness index scores in all other tiers of health facilities.

Indexed as

BangladeshChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNoncommunicable DiseasesRespiration DisordersWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID33661982
PMCPMC7932138
OpenAlexW3134230515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.