Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Data-driven CAD-CAM vs traditional total contact custom insoles: A novel quantitative-statistical framework for the evaluation of insoles offloading performance in diabetic foot.

Moreno D'Amico, Edyta Kinel, Piero Roncoletta, Andrea Gnaldi, Celeste Ceppitelli, Federico Belli, Giuseppe Murdolo, Cristiana Vermigli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Moreno D'AmicoSMART Lab (Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies)-Bioengineering & Biomedicine Company Srl, Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-3603
Edyta KinelDepartment of Rehabilitation, Chair of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-8016
Piero RoncolettaSMART Lab (Skeleton Movement Analysis and Advanced Rehabilitation Technologies)-Bioengineering & Biomedicine Company Srl, Pescara, Italy.
Andrea GnaldiGuantificio Altotiberino Ecosanit Calzature Snc, Anghiari, Italy.
Celeste CeppitelliDepartment of Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology and Metabolism, S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Federico BelliIndependent Researcher, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe MurdoloDepartment of Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology and Metabolism, S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Cristiana VermigliDepartment of Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology and Metabolism, S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia · ITCluster in Biomedicine · ITPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElevated plantar pressures represent a significant risk factor for neuropathic diabetic foot (NDF) ulceration. Foot offloading, through custom-made insoles, is essential for prevention and healing of NDF ulcerations. Objective quantitative evaluation to design custom-made insoles is not a standard method. Aims: 1) to develop a novel quantitative-statistical framework (QSF) for the evaluation and design of the insoles' offloading performance through in-shoe pressure measurement; 2) to compare the pressure-relieving efficiency of traditional shape-based total contact customised insoles (TCCI) with a novel CAD-CAM approach by the QSF.

methodsWe recruited 30 neuropathic diabetic patients in cross-sectional study design. The risk-regions of interest (R-ROIs) and their areas with in-shoe peak pressure statistically ≥200kPa were identified for each patients' foot as determined on the average of peak pressure maps ascertained per each stance phase. Repeated measures Friedman test compared R-ROIs' areas in three different walking condition: flat insole (FI); TCCI and CAD-CAM insoles.

resultsAs compared with FI (20.6±12.9 cm2), both the TCCI (7±8.7 cm2) and the CAD-CAM (5.5±7.3 cm2) approaches provided a reduction of R-ROIs mean areas (p<0.0001). The CAD-CAM approach performed better than the TCCI with a mean pressure reduction of 37.3 kPa (15.6%) vs FI.

conclusionsThe CAD-CAM strategy achieves better offloading performance than the traditional shape-only based approach. The introduced QSF provides a more rigorous method to the direct 200kPa cut-off approach outlined in the literature. It provides a statistically sound methodology to evaluate the offloading insoles design and subsequent monitoring steps. QSF allows the analysis of the whole foot's plantar surface, independently from a predetermined anatomical identification/masking. QSF can provide a detailed description about how and where custom-made insole redistributes the underfoot pressure respect to the FI. Thus, its usefulness extends to the design step, helping to guide the modifications necessary to achieve optimal offloading insole performances.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesShoesAgedComputer-Aided DesignCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic FootDiabetic NeuropathiesFootHumansMiddle AgedPressure

Identifiers

PMID33661973
PMCPMC7932531
OpenAlexW3135072763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.