Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 antibody study using the Easy Check COVID-19 IgM/IgG™ lateral flow assay.

Renee L Higgins, Stephen A Rawlings, Jamie Case, Florence Y Lee, Clarence W Chan, Bethany Barrick, Zoe C Burger, Kiang-Teck J Yeo, Dena Marrinucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent Progress on Rapid Lateral Flow Assay-Based Early Diagnosis of COVID-19.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renee L HigginsTruvian Sciences, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-8545
Stephen A RawlingsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Jamie CaseScripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-0307
Florence Y LeeTruvian Sciences, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Clarence W ChanDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Bethany BarrickScripps Clinic Bio-Repository and Bio-Informatics Core, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Zoe C BurgerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Kiang-Teck J YeoDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Dena MarrinucciTruvian Sciences, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the initial identification of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in December of 2019, researchers have raced to understand its pathogenesis and begun devising vaccine and treatment strategies. An accurate understanding of the body's temporal immune response against SARS-CoV-2 is paramount to successful vaccine development and disease progression monitoring. To provide insight into the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, plasma samples from 181 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients collected at various timepoints post-symptom onset (PSO) were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies via lateral flow. Additionally, 21 donors were tracked over time to elucidate patient-specific immune responses. We found sustained levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies past 130 days PSO, with 99% positivity observed at 31-60 days PSO. By 61-90 days PSO, the percentage of IgM-/IgG+ results were nearly equal to that of IgM+/IgG+ results, demonstrating a shift in the immune response with a decrease in IgM antibody levels. Results from this study not only provide evidence that the antibody response to COVID-19 can persist for over 4 months, but also demonstrates the ability of Easy Check™ to monitor seroconversion and antibody response of patients. Easy Check was sufficiently sensitive to detect antibodies in patient samples as early as 1-4 days PSO with 86% positivity observed at 5-7 days PSO. Further studies are required to determine the longevity and efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and whether they are protective against re-infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingEquipment DesignFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID33661960
PMCPMC7932143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.