Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661888›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Testing, tracing and isolation in compartmental models.

Simone Sturniolo, William Waites, Tim Colbourn, David Manheim, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Internet of Things Based Contact Tracing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simone SturnioloScientific Computing Department, UKRI, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4851-1144
William WaitesSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7759-6805
Tim ColbournUCL Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-6552
David ManheimUniversity of Haifa Health and Risk Communication Research Center, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-8380
Jasmina Panovska-GriffithsUCL Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7720-1121

Funding

Chief Scientist Office COV/EDI/20/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing compartmental mathematical modelling methods for epidemics, such as SEIR models, cannot accurately represent effects of contact tracing. This makes them inappropriate for evaluating testing and contact tracing strategies to contain an outbreak. An alternative used in practice is the application of agent- or individual-based models (ABM). However ABMs are complex, less well-understood and much more computationally expensive. This paper presents a new method for accurately including the effects of Testing, contact-Tracing and Isolation (TTI) strategies in standard compartmental models. We derive our method using a careful probabilistic argument to show how contact tracing at the individual level is reflected in aggregate on the population level. We show that the resultant SEIR-TTI model accurately approximates the behaviour of a mechanistic agent-based model at far less computational cost. The computational efficiency is such that it can be easily and cheaply used for exploratory modelling to quantify the required levels of testing and tracing, alone and with other interventions, to assist adaptive planning for managing disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

EpidemicsModels, BiologicalSARS-CoV-2Basic Reproduction NumberComputational BiologyComputer SimulationContact TracingCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansMathematical ConceptsModels, StatisticalQuarantineSystems Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33661888
PMCPMC7932151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.