Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661858›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Specific Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prognosis-Subtype Distinctions Based on DNA Methylation Patterns.

Guichuan Huang, Jing Zhang, Ling Gong, Daishun Liu, Xin Wang, Yi Chen, Shuliang Guo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Guichuan HuangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First People's hospital of Zunyi (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University), Zunyi, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Jing ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Ling GongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First People's hospital of Zunyi (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University), Zunyi, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Daishun LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First People's hospital of Zunyi (The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University), Zunyi, Guizhou, China (mainland).
Xin WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Yi ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Shuliang GuoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst People’s Hospital of Zunyi · CNAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College · CNChongqing Medical University · CNZunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is one of the major types of non-small-cell lung cancer. Epigenetic alterations, such as DNA methylation, have been recognized to be closely associated with the tumorigenesis and progression. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, we investigated the prognosis subgroups and assessed their correlation with clinical characteristics in LUSC using a methylation array acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. RESULTS A total of 196 DNA methylation sites exhibited a significant association with patient prognosis, and patients were further stratified into 7 prognosis subgroups based upon the consensus clustering. The patients in every subgroup were different in terms of prognosis and TNM stage. In addition, we found these 196 significant methylation sites corresponded to 258 genes. The function enrichment analysis revealed that these 258 genes enriched in biological pathways were closely related to cancers, such as DNA methylation and demethylation, cell cycle DNA replication, regulation of signal transduction by p53 class mediator, and genetic imprinting. Subsequently, we determined the levels of methylation sites in 7 subgroups, and found 24 intra-subgroup-specific methylation sites. Meanwhile, we selected 3 subgroups-specific methylation sites to construct the prognosis model for LUSC patients using multivariate Cox proportional risk regression model analysis. This model can effectively predict the prognosis of LUSC patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified a new classification of LUSC into 7 prognosis subgroups on the basis of DNA methylation data in TCGA, which demonstrated that molecular subtypes are independent factor for prognosis in LUSC. This may provide a more detailed explanation for LUSC heterogeneity. Additionally, this classification will contribute to discovery of new biomarkers of LUSC and provide more accurate subdivision of LUSC. Furthermore, these specific DNA methylation sites and corresponding genes can serve as biomarkers for early diagnosis, accurate therapy, and prognosis prediction.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticHumansLung NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID33661858
PMCPMC7942209
OpenAlexW3132354947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.