ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2021
Relapsed/Refractory International Prognostic Index (R/R-IPI): An international prognostic calculator for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Clinical-Molecular Risk Stratification in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Machine Learning Survival Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Risk of Bias Associated with Varying Sampling Strategies for External Comparator Cohorts for Single-Arm Trials: Insights from Aggressive Lymphoma.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL): EHA Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- A promising prognostic model for patients with AIDS-related lymphoma in the combination antiretroviral therapy era.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Incidence and characterization of secondary CNS lymphoma in 1972 patients with DLBCL: a Danish nationwide cohort study.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Clinical scoring systems, molecular subtypes and baseline [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Development and validation of web-based risk score predicting prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with primary colorectal lymphoma: A population-based study.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- A promising prognostic model for predicting survival of patients with HIV-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the cART era.Cancer medicine · 2023Observational
- Cell of origin is not associated with outcomes of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Hematological oncology · 2023Article
- Sequencing therapy in relapsed DLBCL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022Article
- Outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and influence of chimaeric antigen receptor T trial eligibility criteria in second line-A population-based study of 736 patients.British journal of haematology · 2022Article
- A Novel Prognostic Score Including the CD4/CD8 for AIDS-Related Lymphoma.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disease progression after frontline therapy for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinically significant event. Patients who experience early progression or have refractory disease have especially poor outcomes. Simple, clinically applicable prognostic tools are needed for selecting patients for consideration for novel therapies and prognostication in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Model building was performed in patients from the Surrogate endpoints in aggressive lymphoma (SEAL) consortium with disease progression after frontline immunochemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) measured from date of progression. Validation was performed in the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) and Danish National Lymphoma Register (LYFO) cohorts. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent concordance indices (c-statistic) and calibration with metrics evaluated at 2 years from progression. Note, 1234 of 5112 patients treated with frontline immunochemotherapy in the SEAL consortium developed progressive disease. Time to progression on immunochemotherapy and age at progression were strongly associated with post-progression OS (both p < 0.001). A prognostic model was developed incorporating spline fit for both variables. The model had good concordance in the discovery (0.67) and validation sets (LYFO c = 0.64, MER c = 0.68) with generally good calibration. Time to progression on frontline therapy is strongly associated with post-progression OS in DLBCL. We developed and validated a simple to apply clinical prognostic tool in the R/R setting. The useful prediction of expected outcomes in R/R DLBCL and can inform treatment decisions such as considerations for CAR-T therapy as well as trial designs. The model is available in smartphone-based point of care applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.