Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661430›Full record

Trial reportBrain topography2021

Effects of Robotic Neurorehabilitation on Body Representation in Individuals with Stroke: A Preliminary Study Focusing on an EEG-Based Approach.

Maria Grazia Maggio, Antonino Naro, Alfredo Manuli, Giuseppa Maresca, Tina Balletta, Desirèe Latella, Rosaria De Luca, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain topography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Grazia Maggio *IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Antonino Naro *IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Alfredo ManuliIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Giuseppa MarescaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Tina BallettaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Desirèe LatellaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Rosaria De LucaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Rocco Salvatore CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo - Piemonte, via Palermo, SS113, Ctr. Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy. salbro77@tiscali.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-3166
Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with stroke can experience a drastic change in their body representation (BR), beyond the physical and psychological consequences of stroke itself. Noteworthy, the misperception of BR could affect patients' motor performance even more. Our study aimed at evaluating the usefulness of a robot-aided gait training (RAGT) equipped with augmented visuomotor feedback, expected to target BR (RAGT + VR) in improving lower limb sensorimotor function, gait performance (using Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for lower extremities, FMA-LE), and BR (using the Body Esteem Scale-BES- and the Body Uneasiness Test-BUT), as compared to RAGT - VR. We also assessed the neurophysiologic basis putatively subtending the BR-based motor function recovery, using EEG recording during RAGT. Forty-five patients with stroke were enrolled in this study and randomized with a 1:2 ratio into either the RAGT + VR (n = 30) or the RAGT - VR (n = 15) group. The former group carried out rehabilitation training with the Lokomat©Pro; whereas, the latter used the Lokomat©Nanos. The rehabilitation protocol consisted of 40 one-hour training sessions. At the end of the training, the RAGT + VR improved in FMA-LE (p < 0.001) and BR (as per BES, (p < 0.001), and BUT, (p < 0.001)) more than the RAGT- did (p < 0.001). These differences in clinical outcomes were paralleled by a greater strengthening of visuomotor connectivity and corticomotor excitability (as detected at the EEG analyses) in the RAGT + VR than in the RAGT - VR (all comparisons p < 0.001), corresponding to an improved motor programming and execution in the former group.We may argue that BR recovery was important concerning functional motor improvement by its integration with the motor control system. This likely occurred through the activation of the Mirror Neuron System secondary to the visuomotor feedback provision, resembling virtual reality. Last, our data further confirm the important role of visuomotor feedback in post-stroke rehabilitation, which can achieve better patient-tailored improvement in functional gait by means of RAGT + VR targeting BR.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStrokeBody ImageElectroencephalographyGaitHumansAugmented visuomotor feedbackBody representation (BR)Gait rehabilitationMirror neuron system (MNS)Robot-aided gait training (RAGT)

Identifiers

PMID33661430
OpenAlexW3133747522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.