Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661425›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Fluid attenuation in non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET): an MRI Marker for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in Glioblastoma.

Sohil H Patel, Prem P Batchala, Thomas J Eluvathingal Muttikkal, Sergio S Ferrante, James T Patrie, Camilo E Fadul, David Schiff, M Beatriz Lopes, Rajan Jain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in diffuse glial tumors diagnosis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sohil H PatelDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. shp4k@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-4362
Prem P BatchalaDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Thomas J Eluvathingal MuttikkalDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Sergio S FerranteDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
James T PatrieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Camilo E FadulDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
David SchiffDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
M Beatriz LopesDepartment of Pathology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rajan JainDepartment of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
University of Virginia Health System · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe WHO 2016 update classifies glioblastomas (WHO grade IV) according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation status. We aimed to determine MRI-based metrics for predicting IDH mutation in glioblastoma.

methodsThis retrospective study included glioblastoma cases (n = 199) with known IDH mutation status and pre-operative MRI (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, contrast-enhanced T1W1 at minimum). Two neuroradiologists determined the following MRI metrics: (1) primary lobe of involvement (frontal or non-frontal); (2) presence/absence of contrast-enhancement; (3) presence/absence of necrosis; (4) presence/absence of fluid attenuation in the non-contrast-enhancing tumor (nCET); (5) maximum width of peritumoral edema (cm); (6) presence/absence of multifocal disease. Inter-reader agreement was determined. After resolving discordant measurements, multivariate association between consensus MRI metrics/patient age and IDH mutation status was determined.

resultsAmong 199 glioblastomas, 16 were IDH-mutant. Inter-reader agreement was calculated for contrast-enhancement (ĸ = 0.49 [- 0.11-1.00]), necrosis (ĸ = 0.55 [0.34-0.76]), fluid attenuation in nCET (ĸ = 0.83 [0.68-0.99]), multifocal disease (ĸ = 0.55 [0.39-0.70]), and primary lobe (ĸ = 0.85 [0.80-0.91]). Mean difference for peritumoral edema width between readers was 0.3 cm [0.2-0.5], p < 0.001. Multivariate analysis uncovered significant associations between IDH-mutation and fluid attenuation in nCET (OR 82.9 [19.22, ∞], p < 0.001), younger age (OR 0.93 [0.86, 0.98], p = 0.009), frontal lobe location (OR 11.08 [1.14, 352.97], p = 0.037), and less peritumoral edema (OR 0.15 [0, 0.65], p = 0.044).

conclusionsConventional MRI metrics and patient age predict IDH-mutation status in glioblastoma. Among MRI markers, fluid attenuation in nCET represents a novel marker with high inter-reader agreement that is strongly associated with Glioblastoma, IDH-mutant.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBiomarkersHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMutationNecrosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersIsocitrate DehydrogenaseFluid-attenuationGlioblastomaIsocitrate dehydrogenaseMRINon-contrast-enhancing tumorT2-FLAIR mismatch

Identifiers

PMID33661425
OpenAlexW3135616156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.