Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661423›Full record

Observational studyNeurosurgical review2021

Is function-based resection using intraoperative awake brain mapping feasible and safe for solitary brain metastases within eloquent areas?

Jean-Baptiste Pelletier, Alessandro Moiraghi, Marc Zanello, Alexandre Roux, Sophie Peeters, Bénédicte Trancart, Myriam Edjlali, Emmanuele Lechapt, Arnault Tauziede-Espariat, Gilles Zah-Bi and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean-Baptiste Pelletier *Service de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Alessandro Moiraghi *Service de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Marc ZanelloService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Alexandre RouxService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Sophie PeetersDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bénédicte TrancartService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Myriam EdjlaliUniversité de Paris, F-75006, Paris, France.
Emmanuele LechaptUniversité de Paris, F-75006, Paris, France.
Arnault Tauziede-EspariatUniversité de Paris, F-75006, Paris, France.
Gilles Zah-BiService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Eduardo ParragaService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Fabrice ChretienUniversité de Paris, F-75006, Paris, France.
Edouard DezamisService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France.
Frédéric DhermainService de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy University Hospital, Villejuif, France.
Johan PalludService de Neurochirurgie, GHU Paris, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, F-75014, Paris, France. j.pallud@ghu-paris.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-9844
Université Paris Cité · FRInserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess feasibility and safety of function-based resection under awake conditions for solitary brain metastasis patients. Retrospective, observational, single-institution case-control study (2014-2019). Inclusion criteria are adult patients, solitary brain metastasis, supratentorial location within eloquent areas, and function-based awake resection. Case matching (1:1) criteria between metastasis group and control group (high-grade gliomas) are sex, tumor location, tumor volume, preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score, age, and educational level. Twenty patients were included. Intraoperatively, all patients were cooperative; no obstacles precluded the procedure from being performed. A positive functional mapping was achieved at both cortical and subcortical levels, allowing for a function-based resection in all patients. The case-matched analysis showed that intraoperative and postoperative events were similar, except for a shorter duration of the surgery (p<0.001) and of the awake phase (p<0.001) in the metastasis group. A total resection was performed in 18 cases (90%, including 10 supramarginal resections), and a partial resection was performed in two cases (10%). At three months postoperative months, none of the patients had worsening of their neurological condition or uncontrolled seizures, three patients had an improvement in their seizure control, and seven patients had a Karnofsky Performance Status score increase ≥10 points. Function-based resection under awake conditions preserving the brain connectivity is feasible and safe in the specific population of solitary brain metastasis patients and allows for high resection rates within eloquent brain areas while preserving the overall and neurological condition of the patients. Awake craniotomy should be considered to optimize outcomes in brain metastases in eloquent areas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsWakefulnessAdultBrainBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesCraniotomyHumansRetrospective StudiesAwake surgeryBrain metastasisExtent of resectionFeasibilityIntraoperative brain mappingSafety

Identifiers

PMID33661423
OpenAlexW3127170058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.