Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33661297›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2021

Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis.

Lisette F van Dam, Wilbert B van den Hout, Gargi Gautam, Charlotte E A Dronkers, Waleed Ghanima, Jostein Gleditsch, Anders von Heijne, Herman M A Hofstee, Marcel M C Hovens, Menno V Huisman and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02262052 (Advanced Diagnostic Management of Suspected Recurrent Ipsilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Leg With Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02262052 nacompletednot on this map

Advanced Diagnostic Management of Suspected Recurrent Ipsilateral Deep Vein Thrombosis of the Leg With Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2015 to 2019Enrolled305ConditionsDeep Vein ThrombosisArmsMRDTI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The History of Diagnosing Venous Thromboembolism.Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisette F van DamDepartment of Thrombosis and Hemostasis and.
Wilbert B van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences-Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gargi GautamDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte E A DronkersDepartment of Thrombosis and Hemostasis and.
Waleed GhanimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Østfold, Norway.
Jostein GleditschDepartment of Radiology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Østfold, Norway.
Anders von HeijneDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Herman M A HofsteeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Marcel M C HovensDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Menno V HuismanDepartment of Thrombosis and Hemostasis and.
Stan KolmanDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert T A MairuhuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Mathilde NijkeuterDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marcel A van de ReeDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J van RoodenDepartment of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Robin E WesterbeekDepartment of Radiology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands; and.
Jan WesterinkDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eli WesterlundDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lucia J M KroftDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frederikus A KlokDepartment of Thrombosis and Hemostasis and.
Karolinska Institutet · SEDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLHaga Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLØstfold Hospital Trust · NORijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic workup of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using compression ultrasonography (CUS) can be complicated by persistent intravascular abnormalities after a previous DVT. We showed that magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) can exclude recurrent ipsilateral DVT. However, it is unknown whether the application of MRDTI in daily clinical practice is cost effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of MRDTI-based diagnosis for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT during first year of treatment and follow-up in the Dutch health care setting. Patient-level data of the Theia study (NCT02262052) were analyzed in 10 diagnostic scenarios, including a clinical decision rule and D-dimer test and imaging with CUS and/or MRDTI. The total costs of diagnostic tests and treatment during 1-year follow-up, including costs of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses, were compared and related to the associated mortality. The 1-year health care costs with MRDTI (range, €1219-1296) were generally lower than strategies without MRDTI (range, €1278-1529). This was because of superior specificity, despite higher initial diagnostic costs. Diagnostic strategies including CUS alone and CUS followed by MRDTI in case of an inconclusive CUS were potential optimal cost-effective strategies, with estimated average costs of €1529 and €1263 per patient and predicted mortality of 1 per 737 patients and 1 per 609 patients, respectively. Our model shows that diagnostic strategies with MRDTI for suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT have generally lower 1-year health care costs than strategies without MRDTI. Therefore, compared with CUS alone, applying MRDTI did not increase health care costs.

Indexed as

ThrombosisVenous ThrombosisCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33661297
PMCPMC7948280
OpenAlexW3135402982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.