ReviewHealth policy and planning2021
Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation activities within academic institutions in low- and middle-income countries.
Review in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nursing-Led Knowledge Translation Strategies to Improve Patient Safety in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation in Brazilian health: insights from the Grand Challenges Brazil case study.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Advancing knowledge translation practices to accelerate change in adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health practice: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Translating one health research evidence into action: co-production of rabies control knowledge in Côte d'Ivoire.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- The educational outcomes of medical student engagement in research projects: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Assessing National Health Research System in a resource-limited setting: Insights from Indonesia.PloS one · 2026Article
- The role of universities in enhancing interprofessional collaboration during COVID-19 in Lebanon: academia as neutral convener in a public-private twinning initiative-a qualitative case study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A formative evaluation of the TB Think Tank's role and influence on TB policy in South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- "Community Over Commercialization": Help Us Keep GHSP Open.Global health, science and practice · 2025Article
- Enhancing the role of mass media in the translation of evidence from health policy and systems research in Nigeria.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a strategic academic-government partnership to advance COVID-19 clinical practice guidelines access and uptake in South Africa.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Pre-treatment assessment of chemotherapy for cancer patients: a multi-site evidence implementation project of 74 hospitals in China.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Digital storytelling to promote disability-inclusive research in Africa.African journal of disability · 2024Article
- Facilitating Evidence-Based Practice among Nurses in a Tertiary General Hospital: A Six-Year Practice of an Implementation Strategy Informed by the i-PARIHS Framework.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- 'What we lacked was the courage to take decisions that differed from the rest of the world': expert perspectives on the role of evidence in COVID-19 policymaking in Iraq.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Enabling knowledge translation: implementation of a web-based tool for independent walking prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Determinants of factors affecting readiness of academic institutions to conduct knowledge translation in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The barriers and facilitators of conducting knowledge translation (KT) activities are well-established but less is known about the institutional forces that drive these barriers, particularly in low resource settings. Understanding organizational readiness has been used to assess and address such barriers but the employment of readiness assessments has largely been done in high-income countries. We conducted a qualitative study to describe the institutional needs and barriers in KT specific to academic institutions in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a review of the grey and published literature to identify country health priorities and established barriers and facilitators for KT. Key-informant interviews (KII) were conducted to elicit perceptions of institutional readiness to conduct KT, including experiences with KT, and views on motivation and capacity building. Participants included representatives from academic institutions and Ministries of Health in six countries (Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria). We conducted 18 KIIs, 11 with members of academic institutions and 7 with policymakers. KIIs were analysed using a deductive and inductive coding approach. Our findings support many well-documented barriers including lack of time, skills and institutional support to conduct KT. Three additional institutional drivers emerged around soft skills and the complexity of the policy process, alignment of incentives and institutional missions, and the role of networks. Participants reflected on often-lacking soft-skills needed by researchers to engage policy makers. Continuous engagement was viewed as a challenge given competing demands for time (both researchers and policy makers) and lack of institutional incentives to conduct KT. Strong networks, both within the institution and between institutions, were described as important for conducting KT but difficult to establish and maintain. Attention to the cross-cutting themes representing barriers and facilitators for both individuals and institutions can inform the development of capacity building strategies that meet readiness needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.