Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660949›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Adherence and optimization of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptors blockers and beta-blockers in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.

Valentina Carubelli, Carlo Lombardi, Claudia Specchia, Giulia Peveri, Chiara Oriecuia, Daniela Tomasoni, Mattia Di Pasquale, Riccardo Inciardi, Emirena Garrafa, Marco Metra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Valentina CarubelliDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9430-9820
Carlo LombardiDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Claudia SpecchiaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Giulia PeveriDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chiara OriecuiaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Daniela TomasoniDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Mattia Di PasqualeDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Riccardo InciardiDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Emirena GarrafaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Marco MetraDivision of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University and Civil Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTreatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptors blockers (ARBs) and beta-blockers is frequently suboptimal at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). We investigated the prognostic significance of medical treatment at discharge and its changes during hospitalization. METHODS AND

resultsIn a retrospective analysis, we included 623 patients hospitalized for AHF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<40%). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization to Day 180 since hospital discharge. A total of 249 (42.4%) of patients received no ACEi/ARBs/BB or <50% target dose (TD) of these drugs, 249 (42.4%) had either ACEi/ARBs or BB ≥ 50% of TD, and 89 (15.2%) ACEi/ARBs and BB ≥ 50% of TD at discharge. The primary endpoint was significantly lower in patients receiving at least one drug ≥50% of TD compared with no or low-dose treatment (ACEi/ARBs or BB ≥ 50% TD: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.49-0.98], P = 0.04; ACEi/ARBs and BB ≥ 50% TD: adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI [0.30-0.96], P = 0.03). With regard to treatment changes from admission to discharge, therapy was decreased in 258 (44.6%) patients, stable in 194 (33.6%), and increased in 126 (21.8%). Compared with patients with stable therapy, treatment intensification was associated with a lower rate of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR 0.49, 95% CI [0.29-0.83]; P = 0.01).

conclusionsIn patients with AHF, prescription of ACEi/ARBs/BB ≥ 50% TD at the time of discharge, whether achieved or not through treatment intensification during the hospitalization, is associated with better post-discharge outcomes.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIHeart FailureAftercareAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHumansPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin IIAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsACE-inhibitorsAcute heart failureBeta-blockersOutcomesTherapy

Identifiers

PMID33660949
PMCPMC8120409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.