ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021
Performance characteristics of the Mindray chemiluminescence anti-Müllerian hormone assay.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to define the performance characteristics of the Mindray chemiluminescence assay for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) detection. DESIGNS AND
methodsIntra-assay and total imprecision, analytical sensitivity, linearity, and interference were compared between the Mindray and Roche assays using pools of human serum according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Additionally, male and female reference intervals were established using serum specimens collected from otherwise healthy groups and patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
resultsThe intra-assay and total imprecision percent coefficients of variation for low and high AMH serum levels were 2.74%/ 3.01% and 5.41%/5.35% respectively. The limits of blank, detection, and quantitation were 0.007, 0.01, and 0.03 ng/ml, respectively. The assay displayed good linearity over the range of 0.01-23 ng/ml. The coefficient of determination (R
conclusionThe Mindray AMH assay demonstrated acceptable analytical performance under routine conditions and is suitable for determining AMH levels in serum samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.