Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660854›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2021

COVID-19 guidelines for pregnant women and new mothers: A systematic evidence review.

Madeline A DiLorenzo, Sarah K O'Connor, Caroline Ezekwesili, Spoorthi Sampath, Molly Zhao, Christina Yarrington, Cassandra Pierre

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. COVID-19 guidelines for pregnant women and new mothers: A systematic evidence review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The indirect effects of COVID-19 upon global childhood pneumonia.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Breastfeeding in times of COVID-19: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madeline A DiLorenzoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1284-6428
Sarah K O'ConnorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Caroline EzekwesiliBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Spoorthi SampathBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Molly ZhaoBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina YarringtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Cassandra PierreDepartment of Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly a year after COVID-19 was initially detected, guidance for pregnant and new mothers remains varied.

objectiveThe goal of this systematic review is to summarize recommendations for three areas of maternal and fetal care-breastfeeding, post-partum social distancing, and decontamination. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science spanning from inception to November 9, 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles were included if they focused on COVID-positive mothers, commented on at least one of the three areas of interest, and were published in English. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Our combined database search yielded 385 articles. After removing duplicates and articles that did not cover the correct populations or subject matter, a total of 74 articles remained in our analysis. MAIN

resultsMost articles recommended direct breastfeeding with enhanced precaution measures. Recommendations regarding post-partum social distancing varied, although articles published more recently often recommended keeping the mother and newborn in the same room when possible. Decontamination recommendations emphasized mask wearing, good hand hygiene, and proper cleaning of surfaces.

conclusionIn general, there was a focus on shared decision making when approaching topics such as breastfeeding and post-partum social distancing. Guidelines for decontamination were fairly uniform.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingGuidelines as TopicPhysical DistancingCOVID-19FemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfection ControlMothersPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2breastfeedingCOVID-19post-partum carepregnancyskin-to-skin contactSSC

Identifiers

PMID33660854
PMCPMC9087670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.