Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660777›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Anti-CRISPR AcrIF9 functions by inducing the CRISPR-Cas complex to bind DNA non-specifically.

Wang-Ting Lu, Chantel N Trost, Hanna Müller-Esparza, Lennart Randau, Alan R Davidson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mechanism of Cas9 inhibition by AcrIIA11.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unveil the Secret of the Bacteria and Phage Arms Race.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Mechanisms regulating the CRISPR-Cas systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wang-Ting LuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 661 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Chantel N TrostDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 661 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
Hanna Müller-EsparzaFaculty of Biology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 1, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Lennart RandauFaculty of Biology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 1, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Alan R DavidsonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 661 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

CIHR FDN-15427CIHR MOP-130482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phages and other mobile genetic elements express anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to protect their genomes from destruction by CRISPR-Cas systems. Acrs usually block the ability of CRISPR-Cas systems to bind or cleave their nucleic acid substrates. Here, we investigate an unusual Acr, AcrIF9, that induces a gain-of-function to a type I-F CRISPR-Cas (Csy) complex, causing it to bind strongly to DNA that lacks both a PAM sequence and sequence complementarity. We show that specific and non-specific dsDNA compete for the same site on the Csy:AcrIF9 complex with rapid exchange, but specific ssDNA appears to still bind through complementarity to the CRISPR RNA. Induction of non-specific DNA-binding is a shared property of diverse AcrIF9 homologues. Substitution of a conserved positively charged surface on AcrIF9 abrogated non-specific dsDNA-binding of the Csy:AcrIF9 complex, but specific dsDNA binding was maintained. AcrIF9 mutants with impaired non-specific dsDNA binding activity in vitro displayed a reduced ability to inhibit CRISPR-Cas activity in vivo. We conclude that misdirecting the CRISPR-Cas complex to bind non-specific DNA is a key component of the inhibitory mechanism of AcrIF9. This inhibitory mechanism is distinct from a previously characterized anti-CRISPR, AcrIF1, that sterically blocks DNA-binding, even though AcrIF1and AcrIF9 bind to the same site on the Csy complex.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNADNA, Single-StrandedMutagenesisProtein BindingProteinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNADNA, Single-StrandedProteins

Identifiers

PMID33660777
PMCPMC8034650
OpenAlexW3135612624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.