Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660776›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Unraveling the interaction between doxorubicin and DNA origami nanostructures for customizable chemotherapeutic drug release.

Heini Ijäs, Boxuan Shen, Amelie Heuer-Jungemann, Adrian Keller, Mauri A Kostiainen, Tim Liedl, Janne A Ihalainen, Veikko Linko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heini IjäsBiohybrid Materials, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, 00076 Aalto, Finland.
Boxuan ShenBiohybrid Materials, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, 00076 Aalto, Finland.
Amelie Heuer-JungemannFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Adrian KellerTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Mauri A KostiainenBiohybrid Materials, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, 00076 Aalto, Finland.
Tim LiedlFaculty of Physics and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Janne A IhalainenNanoscience Center, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Veikko LinkoBiohybrid Materials, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, P.O. Box 16100, 00076 Aalto, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a common drug in cancer chemotherapy, and its high DNA-binding affinity can be harnessed in preparing DOX-loaded DNA nanostructures for targeted delivery and therapeutics. Although DOX has been widely studied, the existing literature of DOX-loaded DNA-carriers remains limited and incoherent. Here, based on an in-depth spectroscopic analysis, we characterize and optimize the DOX loading into different 2D and 3D scaffolded DNA origami nanostructures (DONs). In our experimental conditions, all DONs show similar DOX binding capacities (one DOX molecule per two to three base pairs), and the binding equilibrium is reached within seconds, remarkably faster than previously acknowledged. To characterize drug release profiles, DON degradation and DOX release from the complexes upon DNase I digestion was studied. For the employed DONs, the relative doses (DOX molecules released per unit time) may vary by two orders of magnitude depending on the DON superstructure. In addition, we identify DOX aggregation mechanisms and spectral changes linked to pH, magnesium, and DOX concentration. These features have been largely ignored in experimenting with DNA nanostructures, but are probably the major sources of the incoherence of the experimental results so far. Therefore, we believe this work can act as a guide to tailoring the release profiles and developing better drug delivery systems based on DNA-carriers.

Indexed as

Antibiotics, AntineoplasticBuffersDeoxyribonuclease IDNADoxorubicinDrug CarriersDrug LiberationMagnesium ChlorideNanostructuresAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBuffersDeoxyribonuclease IDNADoxorubicinDrug CarriersMagnesium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID33660776
PMCPMC8034656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.