ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2021
Concealed index for concealed penis in prepubertal children.
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the outcomes of full thickness skin graft in the reconstruction of concealed penis in children aged 7 to 14 years.BMC urology · 2024Trial
- The modified Devine procedure for penile reconstruction: A retrospective study of 80 cases.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Efficacy analysis of modified circumcision in the treatment of pediatric concealed penis.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Concealed penis: A review of multilevel classification and surgical reconstruction techniques.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- A comparative study of the clinical efficacy and quality of life of modified Brisson surgery vs traditional Devine surgery in the treatment of concealed penis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of the nursing effects of integrated medical and nursing care intervention in correction surgery for children with concealed penis.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Pediatric obesity and development of the penis and testis.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Guardians of Boys Toward Concealed Penis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe concealed penis (CP) is a congenital or acquired genital anomaly that requires surgical correction. To construct an objective CP severity index, we compared the penile parameters of a CP with a normal penis (NP) and postoperative outcomes of CP patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 391 boys under 14 years who visited our hospital between September 2017 and February 2020 were included. Among these boys, 105 patients had a CP and 286 boys had a NP without CP. The stretched penile length (SPL), penile circumference (PC), and penile length above baseline skin level (BPL) were measured using a ruler (cm), and the testicular volume was measured using an orchidometer (mL). We defined the concealed index according to SPL (CIs) as BPL/SPL and the concealed index according to circumference (CIc) as BPL/PC. A repair of the CP was performed in the CP patients. All parameters were measured before surgery and after three months.
resultsThe CP had significantly shorter SPL and BPL, and smaller CIs, and CIc than the NP. The cutoff values for the CIs and CIc were 0.68 and 0.58, respectively (sensitivity 86.7% and 86.7%; specificity 65.0% and 88.5%, respectively). After repair of the CP, all penile parameters were significantly improved.
conclusionsThe CIs and CIc are useful and objective parameters for checking the severity of CP, and evaluating the postoperative outcome of CP repair. We newly introduced cutoff values for the CIs (0.68) and CIc (0.58) for diagnosing and evaluating CP repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.