Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660418›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2021

Impacts of acoustic-phonetic variability on perceptual development for spoken language: A review.

Carolyn Quam, Sarah C Creel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patterns of Mother, Father, and Child Code-Switching and Links With Child Language Development.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  2. Short-term and long-term adaptive changes in prosodic comprehension.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Talker variability shapes early word representations in English-learning 8-month-olds.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2022
    Article
  10. Developmental change in English-learning children's interpretations of salient pitch contours in word learning.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn QuamDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2607-8597
Sarah C CreelDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

Age and Group Differences in Language-Learning BiasesR00DC013795 · NIDCD · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI QUAM, CAROLYN MARIE · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Using eye tracking to understand speech perception-production relationships in young childrenR03HD096126 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CREEL, SARAH C · 2019 to 2020
$190k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R03HD096126, to S.C.C.NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD096126NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013795NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013795, to C.Q.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews research on when acoustic-phonetic variability facilitates, inhibits, or does not impact perceptual development for spoken language, to illuminate mechanisms by which variability aids learning of language sound patterns. We first summarize structures and sources of variability. We next present proposed mechanisms to account for how and why variability impacts learning. Finally, we review effects of variability in the domains of speech-sound category and pattern learning; word-form recognition and word learning; and accent processing. Variability can be helpful, harmful, or neutral depending on the learner's age and learning objective. Irrelevant variability can facilitate children's learning, particularly for early learning of words and phonotactic rules. For speech-sound change detection and word-form recognition, children seem either unaffected or impaired by irrelevant variability. At the same time, inclusion of variability in training can aid generalization. Variability between accents may slow learning-but with the longer-term benefits of improved comprehension of multiple accents. By highlighting accent as a form of acoustic-phonetic variability and considering impacts of dialect prestige on children's learning, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of how exposure to multiple accents impacts language development and may have implications for literacy development. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language Acquisition Psychology > Language Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSpeech PerceptionAcousticsChildHumansLanguage DevelopmentSpeechchildrenlanguage acquisitionphonological developmentvariabilityword learning

Identifiers

PMID33660418
PMCPMC9836025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.