Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660206›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Sperm selection during ICSI treatments reduces single- but not double-strand DNA break values compared to the semen sample.

Sandra Lara-Cerrillo, Jordi Ribas-Maynou, Candela Rosado-Iglesias, Tania Lacruz-Ruiz, Jordi Benet, Agustín García-Peiró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The intricate "ART" of ICSI.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Double strand DNA breaks in sperm: the bad guy in the crowd.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional Aspects of Sperm Chromatin Organization.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra Lara-CerrilloCIMAB, Barcelona Male Infertility Centre, C/Vallcorba 1A-3A, Sant Quirze del Vallès, 08192, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-7448
Jordi Ribas-MaynouDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), M Building, Av/ de Can Domènech, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Candela Rosado-IglesiasCIMAB, Barcelona Male Infertility Centre, C/Vallcorba 1A-3A, Sant Quirze del Vallès, 08192, Barcelona, Spain.
Tania Lacruz-RuizCIMAB, Barcelona Male Infertility Centre, C/Vallcorba 1A-3A, Sant Quirze del Vallès, 08192, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi BenetDepartament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), M Building, Av/ de Can Domènech, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Agustín García-PeiróCIMAB, Barcelona Male Infertility Centre, C/Vallcorba 1A-3A, Sant Quirze del Vallès, 08192, Barcelona, Spain. info@cimab.es.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación DI-16-08429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo detect a possible bias in sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing when performed on semen samples or on those few spermatozoa selected for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) treatments.

methodsA multimethodological analysis of Single- and Double-Strand DNA Breaks (SSB and DSB, respectively) was performed through the Neutral Comet, the Alkaline Comet, the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) and the Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick End Labelling (TUNEL) assays. SDF was evaluated in (i) semen samples from 23 infertile patients (not achieving pregnancy or suffering recurrent miscarriage); (ii) samples after a Swim-up and (iii) spermatozoa microselected for ICSI (ICSI-S).

resultsThe analysis of 3217 ICSI-S revealed a significant reduction of SSB values compared to the Ejaculate and the Swim-up samples. On the contrary, DSB values were not reduced after any sperm selection method. The No-pregnancy group presented poorer semen parameters and higher SSB values. The Recurrent miscarriage group presented better semen parameters but also higher DSB values.

conclusionThe analysis of SDF on semen samples may not be fully representative of those few spermatozoa selected for ICSI. Since oxidative stress impairs sperm motility and causes SSB, selecting a motile sperm may intrinsically imply choosing a sperm not affected by this damage. DSB have an enzymatic origin which does not affect motility, making it difficult to select a sperm without this damage. Therefore, ICSI treatments could be effective in patients presenting high SSB values. Patients presenting high DSB values should expect bad ICSI results if this damage is not reduced through other specific methods.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Breaks, Single-StrandedAdultDNA FragmentationFemaleHumansMalePregnancySemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicComet assayDouble-strand breaksICSISperm DNA fragmentationSperm selection

Identifiers

PMID33660206
PMCPMC8190426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.