ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2021
Routine Molecular Screening of Patients with Advanced Non-SmallCell Lung Cancer in Circulating Cell-Free DNA at Diagnosis and During Progression Using OncoBEAM
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Tumor DNA detection in cancer: a comprehensive overview of current detection methods and prospects.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Microfluidic Liquid Biopsy Minimally Invasive Cancer Diagnosis by Nano-Plasmonic Label-Free Detection of Extracellular Vesicles: Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pharmacological effects of osimertinib on a chicken chorioallantoic membrane xenograft model with the EGFR exon-19-deleted advanced NSCLC mutation.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Circulating H3K27 Methylated Nucleosome Plasma Concentration: Synergistic Information with Circulating Tumor DNA Molecular Profiling.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Article
- Successful treatment of lung adenocarcinoma complicated with a rare compoundFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of Circulating-Free DNA and Cell-Free RNA in Cancer Management.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- cfDNA Sequencing: Technological Approaches and Bioinformatic Issues.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe use of ultra-sensitive diagnostic tests to detect clinically actionable somatic alterations within the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) within circulating cell-free DNA is an important first step in determining the eligibility of patients with non-small cell lung cancer to receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
methodsWe present the clinical validation (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity) of a highly sensitive OncoBEAM
resultsThe sensitivity and specificity were measured for this BEAMing assay. The number of mutant beads and mutant allelic fraction were measured for each EGFR alteration and the level of detection was established at 0.1% for a median of 2861 genome equivalent (GE) in each reaction using HD780 horizon control DNA, as well as by an internal quality reference standard. Approximately 10%, 27%, and 63% of the 540 samples contained < 1500 GE, a range of 1500-3000 GE, and > 3000 GE, which corresponded to a maximal assay sensitivity of 2.0%, 0.5-0.1%, and 0.1-0.05% mutant allelic fraction, respectively. In a routine hospital setting, 11.4% of non-small cell lung cancer tumors were positive at diagnosis for EGFR alterations, while 43.7% samples harbored EGFR mutations at progression, among which 40.3% expressed EGFR resistance mutations after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment with first- and second-generation drugs.
conclusionsThe OncoBEAM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.