Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660157›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab in the treatment of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, observational study.

Gregor Brecl Jakob, Barbara Barun, Sarah Gomezelj, Tereza Gabelić, Saša Šega Jazbec, Ivan Adamec, Alenka Horvat Ledinek, Uroš Rot, Magdalena Krbot Skorić, Mario Habek

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregor Brecl JakobDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbara BarunDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sarah GomezeljDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tereza GabelićDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Saša Šega JazbecDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivan AdamecDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Alenka Horvat LedinekDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Uroš RotDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Magdalena Krbot SkorićDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mario HabekDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia. mhabek@mef.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-1748
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSo far, a limited number of real-world evidence studies about the effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab (ALM) have been published, some of them with a relatively small number of included patients. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of ALM in real-world clinical practice in two MS centers in Slovenia and Croatia.

methodsThis was a retrospective chart review of 71 consecutive patients with relapsing-remitting MS who were treated with ALM from 2015 till 2018. The following data were collected: gender, age at disease onset, disease duration at ALM initiation, previous disease modifying therapy, number of relapses, active MRI lesions, and EDSS in the year prior to ALM initiation and every year of follow-up.

resultsAll patients completed the standard dosing schedule and were followed for a mean time of 3.2±1.1 years after the initiation of treatment. Complete data for the 2 years after treatment (relapses, EDSS, and MRI) were available for 48 patients, of which 14 (29.2%) achieved NEDA. Clinical NEDA was achieved in 38 out of 63 participants (60.3%). In year 1, 24 out of 57 (42.1%) patients achieved NEDA. In year 2, 26 out of 41 (63.4%) patients achieved NEDA. Lower EDSS prior to starting ALM was the only independent predictor of NEDA in a multivariable model. Adverse events occurred in 58 participants (84.1%), with no new safety signals identified.

conclusionAccording to the data from our cohort of early active RRMS patients we conclude ALM efficacy remains high in the real-world clinical practice.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAlemtuzumabHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesAlemtuzumabAlemtuzumabNo evidence of disease activityRelapsing–remitting multiple sclerosisSafety

Identifiers

PMID33660157
OpenAlexW3134185790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.