Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660057›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2021

Clinical predictors and sequelae of computed tomography defined leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement at medium-term follow-up.

Hashrul N Rashid, Michael Michail, Abdul R Ihdayhid, Cameron Dowling, Nancy Khav, Sean Tan, Jaineel Ramnarain, James D Cameron, Arthur Nasis, Stephen J Nicholls and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Commissural misalignment independently predicts leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Hashrul N RashidMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1879-7172
Michael MichailMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Abdul R IhdayhidMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Cameron DowlingMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Nancy KhavMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Sean TanMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Jaineel RamnarainMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
James D CameronMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Arthur NasisMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Stephen J NichollsMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Robert P GooleyMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. robert.gooley@monashhealth.org.
Monash Medical Centre · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1191131National Heart Foundation of Australia 102452Royal Australasian College of Physicians Kincaid-Smith Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical predictors and sequelae of leaflet thrombosis (LT) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still unclear. Therefore, our aim was to determine the clinical predictors and sequelae at mid-term follow-up of computed tomography (CT)-defined LT following TAVR. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a prospective evaluation with a 320-multislice CT following TAVR for the presence of LT, defined as hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT). Four-dimensional CT image-rendering was performed to determine the presence of reduced leaflet motion (RELM). 172 patients [89 (51.7%) male, mean age 82.8 ± 5.7 years] treated with commercially available TAVR device (Lotus 54%, CoreValve 32% and Sapien 3 14%) were included, with median CT-scan at 6.0 weeks post-TAVR. Prevalence of HALT was 14.0% (24 cases) and RELM was 9.8% (17 cases). On multivariate analysis, patients with HALT were less prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) (OR 9.9), received larger TAVR prostheses (OR 5.7) and higher rates of moderate-severe para-valvular regurgitation (PVR) (OR 16.3). There was no difference in clinical outcomes at a median follow-up of 2.3 years. Patients with RELM had significantly higher transvalvular gradients after discharge when compared to those without RELM.

conclusionsAbsence of OAC, large TAVR prostheses and moderate-severe PVR were predictors for LT. Transvalvular gradients were higher in patients that developed RELM but not HALT. Further studies are warranted to determine the long-term impact of LT on TAVR durability. Prevalence of different sub-types of CT-defined LT (HALT and RELM) and the clinical predictors of developing LT following TAVR. CT computed tomography, HALT hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening, LT leaflet thrombosis, RELM reduced leaflet motion, TAVR transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisThrombosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyHypo-attenuated leaflet thickeningLeaflet thrombosisReduced leaflet motionTAVITAVR

Identifiers

PMID33660057
OpenAlexW3134331616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.