Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660055›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Implant survival of 3rd-condyle and post-cam posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty are comparable at follow-up > 10 years: a systematic review.

David H Dejour, Jacobus H Müller, Mo Saffarini, Michel Timoteo, Pierre Chambat, Gerard Deschamps, Michel P Bonnin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David H DejourLyon-Ortho-Clinic, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France.
Jacobus H MüllerReSurg SA, Rue Saint Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland.
Mo SaffariniReSurg SA, Rue Saint Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland. journals@resurg.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-987X
Michel TimoteoLyon-Ortho-Clinic, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France.
Pierre ChambatRamsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.
Gerard DeschampsCentre Orthopedique Medico Chirurgical, 2 rue du pressoir, 71640, Dracy-le-Fort, France.
Michel P BonninRamsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France.
Federal Roads Office · CHGénérale de Santé · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FRCentre Orthopédique Santy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarise the literature on 3rd-condyle total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs and compare their survival rates to those of post-cam TKA designs. The null hypothesis was that 3rd-condyle TKAs would have equivalent survival rates compared to contemporary post-cam TKAs.

methodsAn electronic literature search for Level I-V studies was independently conducted by two researchers using Medline

resultsA total of 38 studies were identified that reported on kinematics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment, and rates of complications and survival. Mean survival rates ranged from 96 to 98% at 5 years, 78-100% at 5-10 years, and 86-99% at > 10 years for 3rd-condyle PS TKAs. Mean survival rates ranged from 93 to 98% at 5 years, 89-99% at 5-10 years, and 88-95% at > 10 years for post-cam PS TKAs.

conclusionImplant survival rates of 3rd-condyle TKAs are comparable to those of post-cam TKAs at follow-up > 10 years. When compared to post-cam PS TKA, 3rd-condyle designs offer an alternative for younger and more active patients when considering the added benefits of a lowered point-of-contact and larger congruent contact area at the intercondylar tibial sulcus, that reduce risks of loosening and component wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisBiomechanical PhenomenaCross-Sectional StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularTibia3rd condylePosterior stabilisedSurvivalTotal knee arthroplastyTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID33660055
OpenAlexW3135440919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.