Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660013›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2021

Patient Satisfaction After Non-surgical Rhinoplasty Using Hyaluronic Acid: A Literature Review.

Thomas Radulesco, Guillaume De Bonnecaze, Martin Penicaud, Patrick Dessi, Justin Michel

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas RadulescoDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, 147 Bd Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France. thomas.radulesco@ap-hm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5939-5372
Guillaume De BonnecazeDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Martin PenicaudDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, 147 Bd Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Patrick DessiDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, 147 Bd Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Justin MichelDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, 147 Bd Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRHôpital de la Conception · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have focused on assessing patient satisfaction after non-surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid (HA). The main objective of this study was to perform a systematic review assessing patient satisfaction after non-surgical rhinoplasty using HA.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA model. All articles assessing patient satisfaction using self-questionnaires or scales (visual analogic scales, Likert scale) after non-surgical rhinoplasty were included. We also analyzed injection protocols and complications. The criteria for considering studies for the review were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and setting (PICOTS) framework.

resultsA total of 674 patients were included in eight studies. Mean age was 29.5 years old (min = 19, max = 67, sex ratio = 0.20). Rates of "satisfied" or "very satisfied" patients were 100% immediately after injection (n = 404/404 patients), 98.2% in the weeks following injection (n = 628/639 patients), 84.7% 3 months after injection (n = 333/393 patients) and 96.4% one year after injection (n = 60/62 patients). Duration of HA effectiveness ranged between 8 and 14 months. One local infection (0.001%) but no skin necrosis and no blindness were reported. Most of authors used less than 1 mL of HA per procedure.

conclusionsProvided precautions for use and indications are observed, and presuming good anatomical knowledge, non-surgical rhinoplasty is an interesting procedure associated with high satisfaction rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Hyaluronic AcidRhinoplastyAdultHumansPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic AcidDermal fillersHyaluronic acidPatient satisfactionPersonal satisfactionRhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID33660013
OpenAlexW3134643993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.