Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660005›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2022

Bacterial biofilm formation on vaginal ring pessaries used for pelvic organ prolapse.

Felicity G Gould, Marcus P Carey, Erica L Plummer, Gerald L Murray, Jennifer A Danielewski, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Suzanne M Garland

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Vaginal Microbiota and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Novel Coumarins Derivatives for A. baumannii Lung Infection Developed by High-Throughput Screening and Reinforcement Learning.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Development ofFrontiers in reproductive health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felicity G GouldPelvic Floor Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Rd, Parkville, 3051, Australia. felicity.gould@thewomens.org.au.
Marcus P CareyPelvic Floor Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Rd, Parkville, 3051, Australia.
Erica L PlummerCentre for Women's Infectious Diseases Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-2671
Gerald L MurrayCentre for Women's Infectious Diseases Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Jennifer A DanielewskiCentre for Women's Infectious Diseases Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Sepehr N TabriziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia.
Suzanne M GarlandCentre for Women's Infectious Diseases Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Royal Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia Urogynaecology Special Purpose Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective of this study was to characterize the bacterial biofilm on vaginal ring pessaries used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and investigate the relationship between biofilm phenotype and patient symptoms and clinical signs that are suggestive of inflammation.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study of 40 women wearing a ring-shaped pessary continuously for at least 12 weeks. Participants underwent a clinical examination, and the pessary was removed. Clinical signs were recorded. A swab from the pessary surface and a high vaginal swab were collected from each woman. Participants completed a questionnaire on symptoms. Pessary biofilm presence and phenotype were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Vaginal and pessary bacterial composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relationship between biofilm phenotype and symptoms and clinical signs was assessed using logistic regression.

resultsSEM confirmed biofilm formation on all 40 pessaries. Microbiota data were available for 25 pessary swabs. The pessary biofilm microbiota was composed of bacteria typically found in the vagina and was categorized into Lactobacillus-dominated (n = 10/25 pessaries, 40%) communities and Lactobacillus-deficient communities with high relative abundance of anaerobic/facultative anaerobes (n = 15/25 pessaries, 60%). While increasing age was associated with presence of a Lactobacillus-deficient pessary biofilm (odds ratio = 3.60, 95% CI [1.16-11.22], p = 0.04), no associations between biofilm microbiota composition and symptoms or clinical signs were observed.

conclusionsLactobacillus-deficient biofilms commonly form on pessaries following long-term use. However, the contribution of biofilm phenotype to symptoms and clinical signs remains to be determined.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemalePelvic Organ ProlapseBiofilmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLactobacillusPessariesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial biofilmPelvic organ prolapsePessary microbiotaScanning electron microscopicVaginal microbiotaVaginal ring pessary

Identifiers

PMID33660005
OpenAlexW3133641236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.