Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33660002›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Ultrasound assessment of urethral structure and bladder neck position in women with different parities.

Roopali Karmarkar, Alex Digesu, Ruwan Fernando, Vik Khullar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roopali KarmarkarChelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. roopalikarmarkar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7322-6156
Alex DigesuImperial College London, London, UK.
Ruwan FernandoImperial College London, London, UK.
Vik KhullarImperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe study aims to compare the urethral sphincter size and bladder neck position and mobility in women with different parities.

methodsWomen referred to the urodynamics clinic for lower urinary tract and prolapse symptoms were included in the study. A detailed history was taken, and transperineal two- and three-dimensional ultrasound was performed on all the women. The women were divided into four groups according to the vaginal parity. Group 1 had no vaginal childbirths. Group 2 had one, group 3 had two and group 4 had three or more vaginal childbirths. The data was analysed and compared among the groups.

resultsOne hundred fifty women were included in the study. There were 34, 22, 48 and 46 women in groups 1 to 4 respectively. The distribution of different urodynamic diagnoses was similar in all four groups. The urethral sphincter measurements were significantly larger in the vaginally nulliparous group than in all other groups. The measurements were not smaller in multiparous women than in primiparous women. The bladder neck was at a lower position at rest in parous women than nulliparous women. The bladder neck movement was not more in groups 2 to 4 than in group 1.

conclusionThe urethral sphincter was smaller and the bladder neck position was lower in parous women than nulliparous women. These differences were not progressive with increasing parity. Request for elective caesarean section during the second pregnancy to protect the urethra is not supported by this study.

Indexed as

UrethraUrinary Incontinence, StressCesarean SectionFemaleHumansParityPregnancyUltrasonographyUrinary BladderUrodynamicsBladder neckParityUltrasoundUrethraUrethral sphincter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.