Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33659998›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2021

[What does the hand surgeon expect from the radiologist in diagnostic imaging of the hand?]

F von Stillfried

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F von StillfriedKlinik für Rekonstruktive und Plastische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie, Sankt Vincentius Krankenhaus, Holzstr. 4a, 67346, Speyer, Deutschland. F.Stillfried@vincentius-speyer.de.
St. Vincentius-Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor hand surgeons, in addition to anamnesis and clinical examination, imaging is the essential component in diagnostics and the basis for therapy planning. The focus on the special field of the "hand" and the adjacent joints is limited with regard to the anatomical extent, but with regard to the possible clinical pictures it encompasses the entire range of pathological changes. CLINICAL ISSUE: Which imaging techniques support the goal of maintaining the functionality of the hand? PERFORMANCE: The carpal bones can be represented by computer tomography without superimposition. The navicular (scaphoid) should be evaluated sagittally in its longitudinal axis. MRI imaging is useful, for example, when assessing possible ligament injuries or ulnar-carpal complaints on the triangular disc. Stress images prove additional information in the case of of dynamic ligament or joint instabilities. ACHIEVEMENTS: Imaging with conventional X‑rays is the basis of radiological diagnostics of the hand. In addition, the small structures of the hand and fingers to be assessed must be specifically visualized. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION: In order to enable precise assessment of the fine and complex structures on the hand in relation to the clinical complaints, close communication of the anamnesis and questions with the radiologist is desirable.

Indexed as

Carpal BonesSurgeonsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographyRadiologistsHand surgeryRadiologyScaphoid fractureThumb basal joint arthritisUlna impaction syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33659998
OpenAlexW3135037701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.