ReviewFaculty reviews2020
New techniques for studying neurodevelopment.
Review in Faculty reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lurasidone induces developmental toxicity and behavioral impairments in zebrafish embryos.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Transcriptional Control of Axon Guidance at Midline Structures.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Tissue clearing and 3D imaging in developmental biology.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extraordinary diversity, variability, and complexity of cell types in the vertebrate brain is overwhelming and far exceeds that of any other organ. This complexity is the result of multiple cell divisions and intricate gene regulation and cell movements that take place during embryonic development. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these complicated developmental processes requires the ability to obtain a complete registry of interconnected events often taking place far apart from each other. To assist with this challenging task, developmental neuroscientists take advantage of a broad set of methods and technologies, often adopted from other fields of research. Here, we review some of the methods developed in recent years whose use has rapidly spread for application in the field of developmental neuroscience. We also provide several considerations regarding the promise that these techniques hold for the near future and share some ideas on how existing methods from other research fields could help with the analysis of how neural circuits emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.