Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33659925›Full record

ReviewFaculty reviews2021

Non-obstructive azoospermia: current and future perspectives.

Tharu Tharakan, Rong Luo, Channa N Jayasena, Suks Minhas

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Faculty reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A novel hsa_circ_0070963/miR-223-3p/International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential retinoic acid responses across testicular developmentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tharu TharakanSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Rong LuoSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Channa N JayasenaSection of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Suks MinhasDepartment of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, United Kingdom.
Charing Cross Hospital · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility affects 1 in 6 couples, and male factor infertility has been implicated as a cause in 50% of cases. Azoospermia is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate and is considered the most extreme form of male factor infertility. Historically, these men were considered sterile but, with the advent of testicular sperm extraction and assisted reproductive technologies, men with azoospermia are able to biologically father their own children. Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) occurs when there is an impairment to spermatogenesis. This review describes the contemporary management of NOA and discusses the role of hormone stimulation therapy, surgical and embryological factors, and novel technologies such as proteomics, genomics, and artificial intelligence systems in the diagnosis and treatment of men with NOA. Moreover, we highlight that men with NOA represent a vulnerable population with an increased risk of developing cancer and cardiovascular comorbodities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceazoospermiageneticsMale infertilitysperm retrieval

Identifiers

PMID33659925
PMCPMC7894261
OpenAlexW3123081835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.