Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33659475›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2020

Masato Sawada, Mami Matsumoto, Keishi Narita, Natsuko Kumamoto, Shinya Ugawa, Sen Takeda, Kazunobu Sawamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masato SawadaDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Mami MatsumotoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Keishi NaritaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo 409-3898, Japan.
Natsuko KumamotoDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.
Shinya UgawaDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan.
Sen TakedaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Chuo 409-3898, Japan.
Kazunobu SawamotoDepartment of Developmental and Regenerative Neurobiology, Institute of Brain Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal migration is a critical step for the development of neuronal circuits in the brain. Immature new neurons (neuroblasts) generated in the postnatal ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) show a remarkable potential to migrate for a long distance at a high speed in the postnatal mammalian brain, and are thus a powerful model to analyze the molecular and cellular mechanisms of neuronal migration. Here we describe a methodology for

Indexed as

Confocal microscopyMigrationNeuroblastPostnatal neurogenesisPrimary ciliumSuperresolution microscopyTime-lapse imagingVentricular-subventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID33659475
PMCPMC7842616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.