ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Comparative study of the influence of imaging resolution on linear retardance parameters derived from the Mueller matrix.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing colon cancer stages through optical polarimetry-assisted digital staining.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- Imaging and Non-imaging Analytical Techniques Used for Drug Nanosizing and their Patents: An Overview.Recent patents on nanotechnology · 2024Review
- Influence of hematoxylin and eosin staining on linear birefringence measurement of fibrous tissue structures in polarization microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- A Dual-Modality Imaging Method Based on Polarimetry and Second Harmonic Generation for Characterization and Evaluation of Skin Tissue Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Photoacoustic imaging for characterization of radiofrequency ablated cardiac tissues.Lasers in medical science · 2023Review
- Polarization-based probabilistic discriminative model for quantitative characterization of cancer cells.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Assessment of tissue pathology using optical polarimetry.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Polarization imaging-based radiomics approach for the staging of liver fibrosis.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Analyzing the Influence of Imaging Resolution on Polarization Properties of Scattering Media Obtained From Mueller Matrix.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Detection Methods of Nanoparticles Synthesized by Gas-Phase Method: A Review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
- Optimized Classification of Suspended Particles in Seawater by Dense Sampling of Polarized Light Pulses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polarization imaging techniques are emerging tools to provide quantitative information of anisotropic structures, such as the density and orientation distribution of fibers in tissue samples. Recently, it is found that when using Mueller matrix polarimetry to obtain the structural features of tissue samples, some information can be revealed by relatively low-resolution polarization parameter images. Thus, to analyze what kinds of anisotropic optical and structural information contained in high-resolution polarization images are preserved in low-resolution ones, here we carry out a comparative study of the influence of imaging resolution on the Mueller matrix derived linear retardance parameters. We measure the microscopic Mueller matrix of human healthy breast duct tissues and ductal carcinoma
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.