ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Artefact removal in ground truth deficient fluctuations-based nanoscopy images using deep learning.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image denoising or artefact removal using deep learning is possible in the availability of supervised training dataset acquired in real experiments or synthesized using known noise models. Neither of the conditions can be fulfilled for nanoscopy (super-resolution optical microscopy) images that are generated from microscopy videos through statistical analysis techniques. Due to several physical constraints, a supervised dataset cannot be measured. Further, the non-linear spatio-temporal mixing of data and valuable statistics of fluctuations from fluorescent molecules that compete with noise statistics. Therefore, noise or artefact models in nanoscopy images cannot be explicitly learned. Here, we propose a robust and versatile simulation-supervised training approach of deep learning auto-encoder architectures for the highly challenging nanoscopy images of sub-cellular structures inside biological samples. We show the proof of concept for one nanoscopy method and investigate the scope of generalizability across structures, and nanoscopy algorithms not included during simulation-supervised training. We also investigate a variety of loss functions and learning models and discuss the limitation of existing performance metrics for nanoscopy images. We generate valuable insights for this highly challenging and unsolved problem in nanoscopy, and set the foundation for the application of deep learning problems in nanoscopy for life sciences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.