Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33659039›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2021

Phase 1 study of Z-endoxifen in patients with advanced gynecologic, desmoid, and hormone receptor-positive solid tumors.

Naoko Takebe, Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne, Shivaani Kummar, Jerry Collins, Joel M Reid, Richard Piekarz, Nancy Moore, Lamin Juwara, Barry C Johnson, Rachel Bishop and 13 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Naoko TakebeDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Geraldine O'Sullivan CoyneDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Shivaani KummarDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jerry CollinsDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joel M ReidDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Richard PiekarzDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nancy MooreDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Lamin JuwaraLeidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Barry C JohnsonLeidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
Rachel BishopConsult Services Section, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Frank I LinMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Esther MenaMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
M Liza LindenbergMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Larry V RubinsteinBiometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Cecilia Monge BonillaCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Matthew M AmesDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Renee M McGovernDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Howard StreicherDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joseph M CoveyDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
James H DoroshowDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Alice P ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USLeidos (United States) · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Eye Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Intracellular In vivo ImagingZIABC010657 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$20.3M
Phase 01 Clinical TrialsZIABC011078 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DOROSHOW, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS N01 CM052206NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential responses to tamoxifen may be due to inter-patient variability in tamoxifen metabolism into pharmacologically active Z-endoxifen. Z-endoxifen administration was anticipated to bypass these variations, increasing active drug levels, and potentially benefitting patients responding sub-optimally to tamoxifen. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with treatment-refractory gynecologic malignancies, desmoid tumors, or hormone receptor-positive solid tumors took oral Z-endoxifen daily with a 3+3 phase 1 dose escalation format over 8 dose levels (DLs). Safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

resultsThirty-four of 40 patients were evaluable. No maximum tolerated dose was established. DL8, 360 mg/day, was used for the expansion phase and is higher than doses administered in any previous study; it also yielded higher plasma Z-endoxifen concentrations. Three patients had partial responses and 8 had prolonged stable disease (≥ 6 cycles); 44.4% (8/18) of patients at dose levels 6-8 achieved one of these outcomes. Six patients who progressed after tamoxifen therapy experienced partial response or stable disease for ≥ 6 cycles with Z-endoxifen; one with desmoid tumor remains on study after 62 cycles (nearly 5 years).

conclusionsEvidence of antitumor activity and prolonged stable disease are achieved with Z-endoxifen despite prior tamoxifen therapy, supporting further study of Z-endoxifen, particularly in patients with desmoid tumors.

Indexed as

pharmacokineticsphase 1tamoxifenZ-endoxifen

Identifiers

PMID33659039
PMCPMC7899551
OpenAlexW3132969622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.