Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

A Comprehensive Way to Access Hospital Death Prediction Model for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Combination of Traditional Statistics and Machine Learning.

Wenhan Wu, Zongguang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenhan WuInstitute of Digestive Surgery of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan.ORCID 0000-0002-4284-9016
Zongguang ZhouInstitute of Digestive Surgery of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to use traditional statistics and machine learning to develop and validate prediction models for predicting hospital death in patients with AMI and compare these models' performance. PATIENTS AND

methodsData were retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III) electronic clinical database. A total of 338 eligible AMI patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 238) and a validation cohort (n = 100), and all patients were divided into survival groups and nonsurvival groups according to patients' hospital outcomes. The performance of the traditional statistics prediction model and the optimal machine learning prediction model was evaluated and compared with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility in the validation cohort.

resultsUnivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified the following independent risk factors associated with hospital death for AMI in the training cohort, including diastolic blood pressure, blood lactate, blood creatinine, age, blood pH, and red blood cell distribution width. Both the nomogram (AUC = 77.0%, 67.9-86.1%) and optimal machine learning model (AUC = 82.9%, 74.9-91.0%) achieved good discrimination and calibration in the validation cohort. Decision curves analysis showed that the optimal machine learning model has a greater net benefit than that of nomogram in this study.

conclusionThe nomogram achieved a concise and relatively accurate prediction of hospital death in patients with AMI, the machine learning model also has good discrimination and seems to have better clinical utility. Traditional statistics may help infer the relationship between risk factors and hospital death, while machine learning may contribute to a more accurate prediction. Traditional statistics and machine learning are complementary in developing the prediction model for hospital death of AMI. Therefore, a combination of nomogram-machine learning (Nomo-ML) predictive model may improve care and help clinicians make AMI management-related decisions.

Indexed as

acute mesenteric ischemiahospital mortalitymachine learningnomogramprediction model

Identifiers

PMID33658832
PMCPMC7920592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.