Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658759›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Utility Index and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Glaucomatous Patients Comparing with Normal Participants.

Kulawan Rojananuangnit, Nuttawan Sudjinda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing Quality of life of Patients with Cataract and Glaucoma using Generic and Vision-Specific Instruments in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Health state utilities associated with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kulawan RojananuangnitGlaucoma Unit, Ophthalmology Department, Mettapracharak (Wat Rai Khing) Hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-5562
Nuttawan SudjindaGlaucoma Unit, Ophthalmology Department, Mettapracharak (Wat Rai Khing) Hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUtility index is a significant outcome in terms of health economics assessment while patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) evaluates quality of life (QOL) from patient's perspective. Our objective was to evaluate both utility indices and PROMs using generic and eye specific QOL in glaucomatous patients compared with normal population.

methodsThis is a case-control study. We interviewed normal and glaucomatous participants with the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), the European visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and the visual function questionnaire 28 (Thai version) (VFQ-28). The visual function questionnaire utility index (VFQ-UI) and generic utility index from EQ-5D-5L were calculated.

resultsThere were 47 normal and 127 glaucomatous participants in this study. Amongst glaucoma group, 35 participants were in the early stage of the disease, 43 were in the moderate stage, 30 normal vision participants were in the severe stage, 14 participants had blindness one eye, and 5 had blindness both eyes. The mean age of the participants in both groups was statistically similar (63.78±6.84 vs 66.30±8.93 years old, respectively, p=0.062). Underlying diseases between groups were also comparable. The EQ-5D-5L utility index score and the EQ-VAS score were not statistically different between normal and glaucomatous groups, respectively (EQ-5D-5L: 0.874±0.122 vs 0.837±0.191, p=0.215; EQ VAS: 76.06±15.07 vs 74.02 ±15.10, p=0.43). By contrast, VFQ-UI of the glaucomatous group was significantly lower than that of the normal group, (VFQ-UI: 0.833±0.147 vs 0.895±0.070, accordingly, p<0.05).

conclusionsUtility index from the VFQ-UI was a relevant PROMs for evaluating the QOL of glaucomatous patients in terms of visual function specificity and acceptable validity.

Indexed as

EQ-5D-5Lpatient-reported outcome measuresPROMsquality of life in glaucomatous patientsthe European Quality of Life questionnaire in glaucomathe visual function questionnaire 28 Thai-versionthe visual function questionnaire utility index in glaucomautility index of glaucomaVFQ-28VFQ-UI

Identifiers

PMID33658759
PMCPMC7920622
OpenAlexW3130173408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.