Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658681›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Digital public health surveillance: a systematic scoping review.

Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad, Adrienne Kline, Madeena Sultana, Mohammad Noaeen, Elvira Nurmambetova, Filipe Lucini, Majed Al-Jefri, Joon Lee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early Warning of Infectious Disease Outbreaks Using Social Media and Digital Data: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra Shakeri Hossein AbadData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. zshakeri@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4519-864X
Adrienne KlineData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Madeena SultanaData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mohammad NoaeenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Elvira NurmambetovaData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Filipe LuciniData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6090-6846
Majed Al-JefriData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-3632
Joon LeeData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8593-9321

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) RGPIN-2014-04743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous and openly accessible information produced by the public on the Internet has sparked an increasing interest in developing digital public health surveillance (DPHS) systems. We conducted a systematic scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to consolidate and characterize the existing research on DPHS and identify areas for further research. We used Natural Language Processing and content analysis to define the search strings and searched Global Health, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar from 2005 to January 2020 for peer-reviewed articles on DPHS, with extensive hand searching. Seven hundred fifty-five articles were included in this review. The studies were from 54 countries and utilized 26 digital platforms to study 208 sub-categories of 49 categories associated with 16 public health surveillance (PHS) themes. Most studies were conducted by researchers from the United States (56%, 426) and dominated by communicable diseases-related topics (25%, 187), followed by behavioural risk factors (17%, 131). While this review discusses the potentials of using Internet-based data as an affordable and instantaneous resource for DPHS, it highlights the paucity of longitudinal studies and the methodological and inherent practical limitations underpinning the successful implementation of a DPHS system. Little work studied Internet users' demographics when developing DPHS systems, and 39% (291) of studies did not stratify their results by geographic region. A clear methodology by which the results of DPHS can be linked to public health action has yet to be established, as only six (0.8%) studies deployed their system into a PHS context.

Identifiers

PMID33658681
PMCPMC7930261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.