Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658593›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

COVID-19: a simple statistical model for predicting intensive care unit load in exponential phases of the disease.

Matthias Ritter, Derek V M Ott, Friedemann Paul, John-Dylan Haynes, Kerstin Ritter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metoprolol in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. On getting it right by being wrong: A case study of how flawed research may become self-fulfilling at last.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias RitterFaculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany. matthias.ritter@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2543-3673
Derek V M OttNeurology Clinic with Stroke Unit and Early Rehabilitation, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, 12683, Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann PaulCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
John-Dylan HaynesCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin RitterCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. kerstin.ritter@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7115-0020
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One major bottleneck in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is the limited number of critical care beds. Due to the dynamic development of infections and the time lag between when patients are infected and when a proportion of them enters an intensive care unit (ICU), the need for future intensive care can easily be underestimated. To infer future ICU load from reported infections, we suggest a simple statistical model that (1) accounts for time lags and (2) allows for making predictions depending on different future growth of infections. We have evaluated our model for three heavily affected regions in Europe, namely Berlin (Germany), Lombardy (Italy), and Madrid (Spain). Before extensive containment measures made an impact, we first estimate the region-specific model parameters, namely ICU rate, time lag between infection, and ICU admission as well as length of stay in ICU. Whereas for Berlin, an ICU rate of 6%, a time lag of 6 days, and a stay of 12 days in ICU provide the best fit of the data, for Lombardy and Madrid the ICU rate was higher (18% and 15%) and the time lag (0 and 3 days) and the stay in ICU (3 and 8 days) shorter. The region-specific models are then used to predict future ICU load assuming either a continued exponential phase with varying growth rates (0-15%) or linear growth. By keeping the growth rates flexible, this model allows for taking into account the potential effect of diverse containment measures. Thus, the model can help to predict a potential exceedance of ICU capacity depending on future growth. A sensitivity analysis for an extended time period shows that the proposed model is particularly useful for exponential phases of the disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareEuropeForecastingGermanyHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyModels, StatisticalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Spain

Identifiers

PMID33658593
PMCPMC7930200
OpenAlexW3134151738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.