Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658551›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture.

Núria Mach, Léa Lansade, David Bars-Cortina, Sophie Dhorne-Pollet, Aline Foury, Marie-Pierre Moisan, Alice Ruet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary Energy Sources Affect Cecal and Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transcriptomic signature related to poor welfare of sport horses.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Núria MachAnimal Genetic and Integrative Biology, University of Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AGroParisTech, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. nuria.mach@inrae.fr.
Léa LansadePRC, INRAE, CNRS, IFCE, University of Tours, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
David Bars-CortinaMedicine Department, University of Lleida, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
Sophie Dhorne-PolletAnimal Genetic and Integrative Biology, University of Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AGroParisTech, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Aline FouryUniversity of Bordeaux, INRAE, NutriNeuro UMR 1286, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Pierre MoisanUniversity of Bordeaux, INRAE, NutriNeuro UMR 1286, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Alice RuetPRC, INRAE, CNRS, IFCE, University of Tours, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
AgroParisTech · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversitat de Lleida · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elite horse athletes that live in individual boxes and train and compete for hours experience long-term physical and mental stress that compromises animal welfare and alters the gut microbiota. We therefore assessed if a temporary period out to pasture with conspecifics could improve animal welfare and in turn, favorably affect intestinal microbiota composition. A total of 27 athletes were monitored before and after a period of 1.5 months out to pasture, and their fecal microbiota and behavior profiles were compared to those of 18 horses kept in individual boxes. The overall diversity and microbiota composition of pasture and control individuals were temporally similar, suggesting resilience to environmental challenges. However, pasture exposure induced an increase in Ruminococcus and Coprococcus that lasted 1-month after the return to individual boxes, which may have promoted beneficial effects on health and welfare. Associations between the gut microbiota composition and behavior indicating poor welfare were established. Furthermore, withdrawn behavior was associated with the relative abundances of Lachnospiraceae AC2044 group and Clostridiales family XIII. Both accommodate a large part of butyrate-producing bacterial genera. While we cannot infer causality within this study, arguably, these findings suggest that management practices maintained over a longer period of time may moderate the behavior link to the gut ecosystem beyond its resilience potential.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnimal WelfareBacillotaBacteroidetesBiodiversityButyratesCompetitive BehaviorEubacterialesFecesFemaleFibrobacteresGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHorsesMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SButyratesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33658551
PMCPMC7930273
OpenAlexW3135872852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.