Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658522›Full record

ReviewNPJ vaccines2021

Vaccines for human fungal diseases: close but still a long way to go.

Lorena V N Oliveira, Ruiying Wang, Charles A Specht, Stuart M Levitz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. α-1,3-Glucan-Driven Remodeling of the Conidial Cell Wall in anJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  7. A review of the current anti-New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripheral blood CD4The Journal of infection · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pulmonary Fungal Infections 1990-2021.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorena V N OliveiraDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-0076
Ruiying WangDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-4582
Charles A SpechtDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5749-3112
Stuart M LevitzDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. stuart.levitz@umassmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3799-3064
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Preclinical studies of a Cryptococcus vaccine for AIDS patientsR01AI125045 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL, LODGE, JENNIFER K. · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
ROLE OF MACROPHAGES IN CRYPTOCOCCAL INFECTIONSR01AI025780 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL · 1987 to 2019
$7.1M
The contribution of eosinophils and the IL-23/IL-17 axis to host responses to AspergillusR01AI139615 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEVITZ, STUART MICHAEL · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
Role of Mitochondrial CYP2E1 in Chemical Exposure-Driven NeurodegenerationF32ES027306 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMAN, JESSICA HELENE · 2016 to 2018
$171k
Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Division of Intramural Research of the NIAID) AI125045NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI025780NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125045NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI139615NIEHS NIH HHS 27306C0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the substantial global burden of human fungal infections, there are no approved fungal vaccines to protect at risk individuals. Here, we review the progress that has been made and the challenges that lie ahead in the quest towards efficacious fungal vaccines. In mouse studies, protection has been achieved with vaccines directed against fungal pathogens, including species of Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus, that most commonly cause life-threatening human disease. Encouraging results have been obtained with vaccines composed of live-attenuated and killed fungi, crude extracts, recombinant subunit formulations, and nucleic acid vaccines. Novel adjuvants that instruct the immune system to mount the types of protective responses needed to fight mycotic infections are under development. Candidate vaccines include those that target common antigens expressed on multiple genera of fungi thereby protecting against a broad range of mycoses. Encouragingly, three vaccines have reached human clinical trials. Still, formidable obstacles must be overcome before we will have fungal vaccines licensed for human use.

Identifiers

PMID33658522
PMCPMC7930017
OpenAlexW3134624653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.