Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658387›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Predicting transcriptional responses to cold stress across plant species.

Xiaoxi Meng, Zhikai Liang, Xiuru Dai, Yang Zhang, Samira Mahboub, Daniel W Ngu, Rebecca L Roston, James C Schnable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genome-wide identification and analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. DNABERT-based explainable lncRNA identification in plant genome assemblies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoxi MengCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-2037
Zhikai LiangCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-8631
Xiuru DaiCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Yang ZhangCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.ORCID 0000-0003-1712-7211
Samira MahboubCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Daniel W NguCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.
Rebecca L RostonCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-5002
James C SchnableCenter for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588; schnable@unl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-5527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genome-sequence assemblies are available for a growing number of plant species, gene-expression responses to stimuli have been cataloged for only a subset of these species. Many genes show altered transcription patterns in response to abiotic stresses. However, orthologous genes in related species often exhibit different responses to a given stress. Accordingly, data on the regulation of gene expression in one species are not reliable predictors of orthologous gene responses in a related species. Here, we trained a supervised classification model to identify genes that transcriptionally respond to cold stress. A model trained with only features calculated directly from genome assemblies exhibited only modest decreases in performance relative to models trained by using genomic, chromatin, and evolution/diversity features. Models trained with data from one species successfully predicted which genes would respond to cold stress in other related species. Cross-species predictions remained accurate when training was performed in cold-sensitive species and predictions were performed in cold-tolerant species and vice versa. Models trained with data on gene expression in multiple species provided at least equivalent performance to models trained and tested in a single species and outperformed single-species models in cross-species prediction. These results suggest that classifiers trained on stress data from well-studied species may suffice for predicting gene-expression patterns in related, less-studied species with sequenced genomes.

Indexed as

Cold-Shock ResponseGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantModels, GeneticPoaceaeTranscription, GeneticSpecies Specificitycold stresscomparative genomicsmachine learningtranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID33658387
PMCPMC7958178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.