Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658382›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Integration and transfer learning of single-cell transcriptomes via cFIT.

Minshi Peng, Yue Li, Brie Wamsley, Yuting Wei, Kathryn Roeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating single-cell data with biological variables.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Comparison of gene expression in living and postmortem human brain.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minshi PengDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Yue LiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Brie WamsleyNeurogenetics Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Yuting WeiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Kathryn RoederDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; roeder@andrew.cmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-6254

Funding

Genetics Association in Schizophrenia and Other DisordersR37MH057881 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEVLIN, BERNIE · 2013 to 2022
$5.4M
2/2-Discovery and validation of neuronal enhancers associated with the development of psychiatric disordersU01MH116489 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GAYNOR, SOPHIA, GESCHWIND, DANIEL H · 2018 to 2022
$4.5M
Methods for single-cell CRISPR screens and multiomic data: constructing powerful well-calibrated tests, circumventing unmeasured confounding, and accounting for denoising and imputationR01MH123184 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KATHRYN M ROEDER · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123184NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH057881NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large, comprehensive collections of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets have been generated that allow for the full transcriptional characterization of cell types across a wide variety of biological and clinical conditions. As new methods arise to measure distinct cellular modalities, a key analytical challenge is to integrate these datasets or transfer knowledge from one to the other to better understand cellular identity and functions. Here, we present a simple yet surprisingly effective method named common factor integration and transfer learning (cFIT) for capturing various batch effects across experiments, technologies, subjects, and even species. The proposed method models the shared information between various datasets by a common factor space while allowing for unique distortions and shifts in genewise expression in each batch. The model parameters are learned under an iterative nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) framework and then used for synchronized integration from across-domain assays. In addition, the model enables transferring via low-rank matrix from more informative data to allow for precise identification in data of lower quality. Compared with existing approaches, our method imposes weaker assumptions on the cell composition of each individual dataset; however, it is shown to be more reliable in preserving biological variations. We apply cFIT to multiple scRNA-seq datasets of developing brain from human and mouse, varying by technologies and developmental stages. The successful integration and transfer uncover the transcriptional resemblance across systems. The study helps establish a comprehensive landscape of brain cell-type diversity and provides insights into brain development.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingMachine LearningRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisSoftwareTranscriptomeAnimalsHumansMicebrain cellsdata integrationsingle-cell RNA-seqtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID33658382
PMCPMC7958425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.