Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658378›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Cas9-expressing chickens and pigs as resources for genome editing in livestock.

Beate Rieblinger, Hicham Sid, Denise Duda, Tarik Bozoglu, Romina Klinger, Antonina Schlickenrieder, Kamila Lengyel, Krzysztof Flisikowski, Tatiana Flisikowska, Nina Simm and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The avian embryo as a time-honoured animal model in developmental, biomedical and agricultural research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Journal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genome Editing in Pigs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Beate RieblingerLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Hicham SidReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-8166
Denise DudaReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Tarik BozogluClinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-2150
Romina KlingerReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Antonina SchlickenriederReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Kamila LengyelReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Krzysztof FlisikowskiLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Tatiana FlisikowskaLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-117X
Nina SimmLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Alessandro GrodzieckiLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4427-4738
Carolin PerlebergLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Andrea BährClinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Lucie CarrierInstitute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-5820
Mayuko KuromeGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Valeri ZakhartchenkoGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5974-9759
Barbara KesslerGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Eckhard WolfGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Lutz KettlerZoology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-9425
Harald LukschZoology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-7715
Ibrahim T HagagDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Virology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Daniel WiseDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, CB2 1QP Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jim KaufmanDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, CB2 1QP Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Benedikt B KauferDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Virology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany; b.kaufer@fu-berlin.de christian.kupatt@tum.de angelika.schnieke@wzw.tum.de benjamin.schusser@tum.de.
Christian KupattClinic and Polyclinic for Internal Medicine I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany; b.kaufer@fu-berlin.de christian.kupatt@tum.de angelika.schnieke@wzw.tum.de benjamin.schusser@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-1218
Angelika SchniekeLivestock Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany; b.kaufer@fu-berlin.de christian.kupatt@tum.de angelika.schnieke@wzw.tum.de benjamin.schusser@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5761-9635
Benjamin SchusserReproductive Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany; b.kaufer@fu-berlin.de christian.kupatt@tum.de angelika.schnieke@wzw.tum.de benjamin.schusser@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9990-1890
Technical University of Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETUM Klinikum · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified animals continue to provide important insights into the molecular basis of health and disease. Research has focused mostly on genetically modified mice, although other species like pigs resemble the human physiology more closely. In addition, cross-species comparisons with phylogenetically distant species such as chickens provide powerful insights into fundamental biological and biomedical processes. One of the most versatile genetic methods applicable across species is CRISPR-Cas9. Here, we report the generation of transgenic chickens and pigs that constitutively express Cas9 in all organs. These animals are healthy and fertile. Functionality of Cas9 was confirmed in both species for a number of different target genes, for a variety of cell types and in vivo by targeted gene disruption in lymphocytes and the developing brain, and by precise excision of a 12.7-kb DNA fragment in the heart. The Cas9 transgenic animals will provide a powerful resource for in vivo genome editing for both agricultural and translational biomedical research, and will facilitate reverse genetics as well as cross-species comparisons.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedChickensLivestockSwineCas9 transgenic chickenCas9 transgenic pigCRISPR-Cas9in vivo genome editing

Identifiers

PMID33658378
PMCPMC7958376
OpenAlexW3135540402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.