Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658302›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Cost-effectiveness of community health systems strengthening: quality improvement interventions at community level to realise maternal and child health gains in Kenya.

Meghan Bruce Kumar, Jason J Madan, Peter Auguste, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Lilian Otiso, Christian B Ochieng, Nelly Muturi, Elizabeth Mgamb, Edwine Barasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meghan Bruce KumarDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-8328
Jason J MadanUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Peter AugusteUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK Miriam.Taegtmeyer@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-2536
Lilian OtisoLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christian B OchiengResearch and Strategic Information, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nelly MuturiResearch and Strategic Information, LVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth MgambDepartment of Health, Migori County Government, Migori, Kenya.
Edwine BarasaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-7177

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T003324/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImprovements in maternal and infant health outcomes are policy priorities in Kenya. Achieving these outcomes depends on early identification of pregnancy and quality of primary healthcare. Quality improvement interventions have been shown to contribute to increases in identification, referral and follow-up of pregnant women by community health workers. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using quality improvement at community level to reduce maternal and infant mortality in Kenya.

methodsWe estimated the cost-effectiveness of quality improvement compared with standard of care treatment for antenatal and delivering mothers using a decision tree model and taking a health system perspective. We used both process (antenatal initiation in first trimester and skilled delivery) and health outcomes (maternal and infant deaths averted, as well as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) as our effectiveness measures and actual implementation costs, discounting costs only. We conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

resultsWe found that the community quality improvement intervention was more cost-effective compared with standard community healthcare, with incremental cost per DALY averted of $249 under the deterministic analysis and 76% likelihood of cost-effectiveness under the probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a standard threshold. The deterministic estimate of incremental cost per additional skilled delivery was US$10, per additional early antenatal care presentation US$155, per maternal death averted US$5654 and per infant death averted US$37 536 (2017 dollars).

conclusionsThis analysis shows that the community quality improvement intervention was cost-effective compared with the standard community healthcare in Kenya due to improvements in antenatal care uptake and skilled delivery. It is likely that quality improvement interventions are a good investment and may also yield benefits in other health areas.

Indexed as

Child HealthQuality ImprovementChildCommunity Health PlanningCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantKenyaPregnancychild healthhealth economicshealth systems evaluationmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID33658302
PMCPMC7931757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.