Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658207›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Hunting bats adjust their echolocation to receive weak prey echoes for clutter reduction.

Laura Stidsholt, Stefan Greif, Holger R Goerlitz, Kristian Beedholm, Jamie Macaulay, Mark Johnson, Peter Teglberg Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Onboard recordings reveal how bats maneuver under severe acoustic interference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura StidsholtZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. laura.stidsholt@bio.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-7835
Stefan GreifDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-2435
Holger R GoerlitzAcoustic and Functional Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9677-8073
Kristian BeedholmZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jamie MacaulayZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-4889
Mark JohnsonAarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-3197
Peter Teglberg MadsenZoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How animals extract information from their surroundings to guide motor patterns is central to their survival. Here, we use echo-recording tags to show how wild hunting bats adjust their sensory strategies to their prey and natural environment. When searching, bats maximize the chances of detecting small prey by using large sensory volumes. During prey pursuit, they trade spatial for temporal information by reducing sensory volumes while increasing update rate and redundancy of their sensory scenes. These adjustments lead to very weak prey echoes that bats protect from interference by segregating prey sensory streams from the background using a combination of fast-acting sensory and motor strategies. Counterintuitively, these weak sensory scenes allow bats to be efficient hunters close to background clutter broadening the niches available to hunt for insects.

Identifiers

PMID33658207
PMCPMC7929515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.