ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
Determinants of Knowledge About Dietary Supplements Among Polish Internet Users: Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Validity and reliability of ChatGPT's responses on dietary supplements in Japan: A quality assessment and content analysis.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Perceived awareness, objective nutrition knowledge, and health beliefs about probiotics and prebiotics among adults in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Gender and Education Influences on Dietary Supplement Awareness in Poland: A Nationally Representative Survey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Evaluating knowledge, habits, and beliefs regarding dietary supplements as a protective measure against COVID-19 in Malaysia and Iraq: A postsecond wave cross-sectional analysis.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Personality traits and health-related behaviors in medical students facing a stressful event.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Who Benefits from Fermented Food Consumption? A Comparative Analysis between Psychiatrically Ill and Psychiatrically Healthy Medical Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Effect of Exposure to "Exemption" Video Advertisements for Functional Foods: A Randomized Control Study in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Association Between Consumption of Fermented Food and Food-Derived Prebiotics With Cognitive Performance, Depressive, and Anxiety Symptoms in Psychiatrically Healthy Medical Students Under Psychological Stress: A Prospective Cohort Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Use of Dietary Supplements and Perceived Knowledge among Adults Living with Fibromyalgia in Norway: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Dietary Supplements-For Whom? The Current State of Knowledge about the Health Effects of Selected Supplement Use.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Health-, medication- and dietary supplement-related behaviors and beliefs relatively unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Article
- Decrease in Salivary Serotonin in Response to Probiotic Supplementation WithFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn accurate understanding of dietary supplements (DS) is a prerequisite for informed decisions regarding their intake. However, there is a need for studies on this understanding among the public based on validated research tools.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the knowledge about DS among Polish internet users with no medical education and to identify its determinants and design an appropriate predictive model.
methodsThe study protocol was prospectively registered with a statistical analysis plan. Polish users of a web-based health service and a social networking service were administered a survey consisting of the recently developed questionnaire on knowledge about DS, the questionnaire on trust in advertising DS, the beliefs about medicines questionnaire, and several other health-related single-item measures and sociodemographic questions. The results were subjected to general linear modeling.
resultsA total of 6273 participants were included. Of the 17 yes or no questions in the questionnaire of knowledge about DS, the mean number of correct responses was 9.0 (95% CI 8.9-9.1). Health service users performed worse than social networking users by 2.3 points (95% CI 2.1-2.5) in an analysis adjusted for potential confounders. Internet users had fewer true beliefs about DS if they presented higher trust in their advertising (adjusted β=-.37; 95% CI -.39 to -.34), used DS (adjusted β=-.14; 95% CI -.17 to -.12), experienced their positive effect (adjusted β=-.16; 95% CI -.18 to -.13), were older or younger than 35 years (adjusted β=-.14; 95% CI -.17 to -.12), expressed interest in the topic of DS (adjusted β=-.10; 95% CI -.13 to -.08), reported getting information about the products from friends (adjusted β=-.13; 95% CI -.15 to -.11), and believed that medicines are harmful (adjusted β=-.12; 95% CI -.15 to -.10). The proposed 5-predictor model could explain 31.2% of the variance in knowledge about DS. The model appeared resistant to overfitting and was able to forecast most of the observed associations.
conclusionsPolish internet users with no medical education exhibit some false beliefs regarding DS. Trusting the advertising of DS appears to conflict with knowledge about them. There is an urgent need for effective web-based educational campaigns on DS and the promotion of advertising literacy. After the proposed predictive model is externally validated, it may help identify the least informed target audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.