Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658173›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Determinants of Knowledge About Dietary Supplements Among Polish Internet Users: Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

Michał Seweryn Karbownik, Robert Horne, Ewelina Paul, Edward Kowalczyk, Janusz Szemraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gender and Education Influences on Dietary Supplement Awareness in Poland: A Nationally Representative Survey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michał Seweryn KarbownikDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4416-2736
Robert HorneCentre for Behavioural Medicine, The School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-8438
Ewelina PaulOsom Studio, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-1163
Edward KowalczykDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2250-6040
Janusz SzemrajDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6052-3557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn accurate understanding of dietary supplements (DS) is a prerequisite for informed decisions regarding their intake. However, there is a need for studies on this understanding among the public based on validated research tools.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the knowledge about DS among Polish internet users with no medical education and to identify its determinants and design an appropriate predictive model.

methodsThe study protocol was prospectively registered with a statistical analysis plan. Polish users of a web-based health service and a social networking service were administered a survey consisting of the recently developed questionnaire on knowledge about DS, the questionnaire on trust in advertising DS, the beliefs about medicines questionnaire, and several other health-related single-item measures and sociodemographic questions. The results were subjected to general linear modeling.

resultsA total of 6273 participants were included. Of the 17 yes or no questions in the questionnaire of knowledge about DS, the mean number of correct responses was 9.0 (95% CI 8.9-9.1). Health service users performed worse than social networking users by 2.3 points (95% CI 2.1-2.5) in an analysis adjusted for potential confounders. Internet users had fewer true beliefs about DS if they presented higher trust in their advertising (adjusted β=-.37; 95% CI -.39 to -.34), used DS (adjusted β=-.14; 95% CI -.17 to -.12), experienced their positive effect (adjusted β=-.16; 95% CI -.18 to -.13), were older or younger than 35 years (adjusted β=-.14; 95% CI -.17 to -.12), expressed interest in the topic of DS (adjusted β=-.10; 95% CI -.13 to -.08), reported getting information about the products from friends (adjusted β=-.13; 95% CI -.15 to -.11), and believed that medicines are harmful (adjusted β=-.12; 95% CI -.15 to -.10). The proposed 5-predictor model could explain 31.2% of the variance in knowledge about DS. The model appeared resistant to overfitting and was able to forecast most of the observed associations.

conclusionsPolish internet users with no medical education exhibit some false beliefs regarding DS. Trusting the advertising of DS appears to conflict with knowledge about them. There is an urgent need for effective web-based educational campaigns on DS and the promotion of advertising literacy. After the proposed predictive model is externally validated, it may help identify the least informed target audience.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInternetCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPolandSurveys and Questionnairesadvertisingbeliefsdietary supplementseducationhealth servicesknowledgeonline social networkingPolandstatistical model

Identifiers

PMID33658173
PMCPMC8100877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.