Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658102›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2022

Rationale and Design of the National Neuropsychology Network.

David W Loring, Russell M Bauer, Lucia Cavanagh, Daniel L Drane, Kristen D Enriquez, Steven P Reise, KuoChung Shih, Laura Glass Umfleet, Dustin Wahlstrom, Fiona Whelan and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Digital Neuropsychology beyond Computerized Cognitive Assessment: Applications of Novel Digital Technologies.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

David W Loring *Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2497-1074
Russell M Bauer *Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32610, USA.
Lucia Cavanagh *Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA.
Daniel L Drane *Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329, USA.
Kristen D EnriquezDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA.
Steven P ReiseDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90095, USA.
KuoChung ShihDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA.
Laura Glass Umfleet *Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7943-0406
Dustin Wahlstrom *Pearson Clinical Assessment, San Antonio, TX78259, USA.
Fiona Whelan *Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA.
Keith F Widaman *Graduate School of Education, University of California, Riverside, CA92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6424-3998
Robert M Bilder *Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90024, USA.
NNN Study Group
Neurobehavioral Systems · USEmory University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USPearson (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

National Neuropsychological Network (NNN)R01MH118514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DANIEL L DRANE, David W. Loring · 2019 to 2026
$9.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe National Neuropsychology Network (NNN) is a multicenter clinical research initiative funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; R01 MH118514) to facilitate neuropsychology's transition to contemporary psychometric assessment methods with resultant improvement in test validation and assessment efficiency.

methodThe NNN includes four clinical research sites (Emory University; Medical College of Wisconsin; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); University of Florida) and Pearson Clinical Assessment. Pearson Q-interactive (Q-i) is used for data capture for Pearson published tests; web-based data capture tools programmed by UCLA, which serves as the Coordinating Center, are employed for remaining measures.

resultsNNN is acquiring item-level data from 500-10,000 patients across 47 widely used Neuropsychology (NP) tests and sharing these data via the NIMH Data Archive. Modern psychometric methods (e.g., item response theory) will specify the constructs measured by different tests and determine their positive/negative predictive power regarding diagnostic outcomes and relationships to other clinical, historical, and demographic factors. The Structured History Protocol for NP (SHiP-NP) helps standardize acquisition of relevant history and self-report data.

conclusionsNNN is a proof-of-principle collaboration: by addressing logistical challenges, NNN aims to engage other clinics to create a national and ultimately an international network. The mature NNN will provide mechanisms for data aggregation enabling shared analysis and collaborative research. NNN promises ultimately to enable robust diagnostic inferences about neuropsychological test patterns and to promote the validation of novel adaptive assessment strategies that will be more efficient, more precise, and more sensitive to clinical contexts and individual/cultural differences.

Indexed as

NeuropsychologyHumansNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsWisconsinClinical decision-makingCollaborative neuropsychologyModern psychometric methodsPsychological tests

Identifiers

PMID33658102
PMCPMC9007164
OpenAlexW3133739355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.