Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658054›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

Women's empowerment, intrahousehold influences, and health system design on modern contraceptive use in rural Mali: a multilevel analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

Caroline Whidden, Youssouf Keita, Emily Treleaven, Jessica Beckerman, Ari Johnson, Aminata Cissé, Jenny Liu, Kassoum Kayentao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Caroline WhiddenMuso, Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, Bamako, Mali. cwhidden@musohealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-4632
Youssouf KeitaMuso, Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Emily TreleavenInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jessica BeckermanMuso, Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Ari JohnsonMuso, Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Aminata CisséSub-Direction of Reproductive Health, General Directorate of Health and Public Hygiene, Bamako, Mali.
Jenny LiuInstitute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kassoum KayentaoMuso, Route de 501 Lodgements SEMA, Bamako, Mali.
Mali-Folkecenter · MLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique · MLUniversité des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako · MLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent challenges in meeting reproductive health and family planning goals underscore the value in determining what factors can be leveraged to facilitate modern contraceptive use, especially in poor access settings. In Mali, where only 15% of reproductive-aged women use modern contraception, understanding how women's realities and health system design influence contraceptive use helps to inform strategies to achieve the nation's target of 30% by 2023.

methodsUsing household survey data from the baseline round of a cluster-randomized trial, including precise geolocation data from all households and public sector primary health facilities, we used a multilevel model to assess influences at the individual, household, community, and health system levels on women's modern contraceptive use. In a three-level, mixed-effects logistic regression, we included measures of women's decision-making and mobility, as well as socio-economic sources of empowerment (education, paid labor), intrahousehold influences in the form of a co-residing user, and structural factors related to the health system, including distance to facility.

resultsLess than 5% of the 14,032 women of reproductive age in our study used a modern method of contraception at the time of the survey. Women who played any role in decision-making, who had any formal education and participated in any paid labor, were more likely to use modern contraception. Women had three times the odds of using modern contraception if they lived in a household with another woman, typically a co-wife, who also used a modern method. Compared to women closest to a primary health center, those who lived between 2 and 5 km were half as likely to use modern contraception, and those between 5 and 10 were a third as likely.

conclusionsDespite chronically poor service availability across our entire study area, some women-even pairings of women in single households-transcended barriers to use modern contraception. When planning and implementing strategies to expand access to contraception, policymakers and practitioners should consider women's empowerment, social networks, and health system design. Accessible and effective health systems should reconsider the conventional approach to community-based service delivery, including distance as a barrier only beyond 5 km.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsEmpowermentHealth Services AccessibilityPower, PsychologicalAdultChildContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaliMultilevel AnalysisRural PopulationContraceptive AgentsContraceptionEmpowermentFamily planningHealth systemsMaliReproductive healthSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID33658054
PMCPMC7931535
OpenAlexW3135602056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.