Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658047›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

From fringe to centre-stage: experiences of mainstreaming health equity in a health research collaboration.

Ana Porroche-Escudero, Jennie Popay, Fiona Ward, Saiqa Ahmed, Dorkas Akeju, Jane Cloke, Mark Gabbay, Shaima Hassan, Koser Khan, Esmaeil Khedmati-Morasae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Porroche-EscuderoLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. a.porroche-escudero@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2740-5273
Jennie PopayDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Fiona WardARC NWC, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Saiqa AhmedARC NWC, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Dorkas AkejuARC NWC, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jane ClokeARC NWC, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mark GabbayARC NWC, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Shaima HassanARC NWC, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Koser KhanARC NWC, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Esmaeil Khedmati-MorasaeBusiness School, Exeter University, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAction to address the structural determinants of health inequalities is prioritized in high-level initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and many national health strategies. Yet, the focus of much local policy and practice is on behaviour change. Research shows that whilst lifestyle approaches can improve population health, at best they fail to reduce health inequalities because they fail to address upstream structural determinants of behaviour and health outcomes. In health research, most efforts have been directed at three streams of work: understanding causal pathways; evaluating the equity impact of national policy; and developing and evaluating lifestyle/behavioural approaches to health improvement. As a result, there is a dearth of research on effective interventions to reduce health inequalities that can be developed and implemented at a local level.

objectiveTo describe an initiative that aimed to mainstream a focus on health equity in a large-scale research collaboration in the United Kingdom and to assess the impact on organizational culture, research processes and individual research practice.

methodsThe study used multiple qualitative methods including semi-structured interviews, focus groups and workshops (n = 131 respondents including Public Advisers, university, National Health Service (NHS), and local and document review.

resultsutilizing Extended Normalization Process Theory (ENPT) and gender mainstreaming theory, the evaluation illuminated (i) the processes developed by Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast to integrate ways of thinking and acting to tackle the upstream social determinants of health inequities (i.e. to mainstream a health equity focus) and (ii) the factors that promoted or frustrated these efforts.

conclusionsFindings highlight the role of contextual factors and processes aimed at developing and implementing a robust strategy for mainstreaming health equity as building blocks for transformative change in applied health research.

Indexed as

Health EquitySustainable DevelopmentFocus GroupsHealth PolicyHumansSocial Determinants of HealthState MedicineUnited KingdomHealth inequalitiesImplementationMainstreamingResearch collaborationSocial determinants of healthUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33658047
PMCPMC7928171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.